Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25930719›Full record

Trial reportCancer2015

5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of immediate versus delayed zoledronic acid for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women with breast cancer starting letrozole after tamoxifen: N03CC (Alliance) trial.

Nina D Wagner-Johnston, Jeff A Sloan, Heshan Liu, Ann E Kearns, Stephanie L Hines, Suneetha Puttabasavaiah, Shaker R Dakhil, Jacqueline M Lafky, Edith A Perez, Charles L Loprinzi

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness and safety of bone protective interventions to mitigate bone loss and skeletal fractures experienced by patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Bone loss induced by cancer treatments in breast and prostate cancer patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Cancer Treatment and Bone Health.Calcified tissue international · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Cancel the denosumab holiday.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Proceedings of the 2015 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Clinical Applications of Scientific Advances in Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nina D Wagner-JohnstonDivision of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jeff A SloanAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Heshan LiuAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ann E KearnsDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Stephanie L HinesDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Suneetha PuttabasavaiahAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Shaker R DakhilWichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, Kansas.
Jacqueline M LafkyDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Edith A PerezDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Charles L LoprinziDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · USJacksonville College · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USWashington University in St. Louis · USWichita Clinic · USWinnMed · US

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP B MINORITY SATELLITE SUPPLEMENU10CA031946 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1985 to 2013
$158.4M
Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Collaborations and NCORP Collective ManagementUG1CA189823 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$120.6M
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHU10CA025224 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 1985 to 2013
$85.0M
CANCER &LEUKEMIA GROUP B STATISTICAL CENTERU10CA033601 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SARGENT, DANIEL J. · 1985 to 2013
$69.4M
SUPPLEMENTU10CA037404 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LOPRINZI, CHARLES L · 1985 to 2014
$34.8M
COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035431 · NCI · VIA CHRISTI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAKHIL, SHAKER R · 1985 to 2014
$24.0M
SIOUX COMMUNITY CANCER CONSORTIUMU10CA035103 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI MAZURCZAK, MIROSLAW · 1985 to 2014
$11.6M
DULUTH COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035269 · NCI · ESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH · PI NIKCEVICH, DANIEL A · 1985 to 2014
$10.7M
TOLEDO COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035415 · NCI · TOLEDO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ONCOLOGY PROG · PI MOWAT, REX BRADLEY · 1985 to 2014
$9.9M
National Community Oncology Research ProjectUG1CA189808 · NCI · VIA CHRISTI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAKHIL, SHAKER R · 2014 to 2018
$8.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA-25224NCI NIH HHS CA-35103NCI NIH HHS CA-35269NCI NIH HHS CA-35415NCI NIH HHS CA-37404NCI NIH HHS N01 CA035431NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS U10 CA025224NCI NIH HHS U10 CA031946NCI NIH HHS U10 CA033601NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035103NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035269NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035415NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035431NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037404NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189808NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostmenopausal women with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitors are at an increased risk of bone loss. The current study was undertaken to determine whether upfront versus delayed treatment with zoledronic acid (ZA) impacted bone loss. This report described the 5-year follow-up results.

methodsA total of 551 postmenopausal women with breast cancer who completed tamoxifen treatment and were undergoing daily letrozole treatment were randomized to either upfront (274 patients) or delayed (277 patients) ZA at a dose of 4 mg intravenously every 6 months. In the patients on the delayed treatment arm, ZA was initiated for a postbaseline bone mineral density T-score of <-2.0 or fracture.

resultsThe incidence of a 5% decrease in the total lumbar spine bone mineral density at 5 years was 10.2% in the upfront treatment arm versus 41.2% in the delayed treatment arm (P<.0001). A total of 41 patients in the delayed treatment arm were eventually started on ZA. With the exception of increased NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 1/2 elevated creatinine and fever in the patients treated on the upfront arm and cerebrovascular ischemia among those in the delayed treatment arm, there were no significant differences observed between arms with respect to the most common adverse events of arthralgia and back pain. Osteoporosis occurred less frequently in the upfront treatment arm (2 vs 8 cumulative cases), although this difference was not found to be statistically significant. Bone fractures occurred in 24 patients in the upfront treatment arm versus 25 patients in the delayed treatment arm.

conclusionsImmediate treatment with ZA prevented bone loss compared with delayed treatment in postmenopausal women receiving letrozole and these differences were maintained at 5 years. The incidence of osteoporosis or fractures was not found to be significantly different between treatment arms.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsBreast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleChemotherapy, AdjuvantDiphosphonatesDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImidazolesLetrozoleMaleAntineoplastic AgentsBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesImidazolesLetrozoleNitrilesTamoxifenTriazolesZoledronic Acidbone lossbreast cancerletrozolepostmenopausaltamoxifenzoledronic acid

Identifiers

PMID25930719
PMCPMC4512885
OpenAlexW1887639305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.