Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25930236›Full record

Trial reportAIDS care2015

HIV infection and related risk behaviors: does school support level the playing field between orphans and nonorphans in Zimbabwe?

Winnie Luseno, Lei Zhang, Simbarashe Rusakaniko, Hyunsan Cho, Denise Hallfors

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. School Support as Structural HIV Prevention for Adolescent Orphans in Western Kenya.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2018
    Trial
  3. Process Evaluation of a Clinical Trial to Test School Support as HIV Prevention Among Orphaned Adolescents in Western Kenya.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2017
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Winnie Lusenoa Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
Lei Zhanga Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
Simbarashe Rusakanikob Department of Community Medicine , University of Zimbabwe , Harare , Zimbabwe.
Hyunsan Choa Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
Denise Hallforsa Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation · USInstitute for Research and Evaluation · USUniversity of Zimbabwe · ZW

Funding

Can Church Schools Reduce Risk of HIV Infection for Orphan Girls in Zimbabwe?R01HD055838 · NICHD · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI HALLFORS, DENISE DION · 2007 to 2012
$4.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD055838NICHD NIH HHS R01HD55838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research is limited on whether providing school support to female adolescent orphans mitigates their HIV risk disadvantage compared to other female adolescents. This paper examines 2011 Zimbabwe Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS) HIV-related biomarker and behavior data for orphaned and nonorphaned rural adolescent females to compare findings from a similar sample participating in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing school support as HIV prevention. HIV status, marriage, pregnancy, sexual debut, school dropout, years of schooling, and socioeconomic status were analyzed with the combined data-sets. Bivariate analyses compared variables between RCT comprehensive intervention and delayed partial intervention conditions, and between ZDHS orphan and nonorphan groups. Multivariable analyses included a series of group comparisons as follows: ZDHS orphans vs. ZDHS nonorphans; RCT orphans in each condition vs. ZDHS nonorphans; RCT orphans in each condition vs. ZDHS orphans. Analyses methods accounted for the complex survey sampling design within each data-set. A total of 751 observations were included. All orphan groups had consistently higher odds of HIV infection than ZDHS nonorphans. ZDHS orphans had higher odds of marriage, pregnancy, and sexual debut than ZDHS nonorphans. Comprehensive intervention participants had lower odds of marriage, sexual debut, and school dropout than ZDHS nonorphans. RCT participants in both conditions had lower odds of marriage, sexual debut, and school dropout than ZDHS orphans. The findings indicate that orphans are at a distinct disadvantage to HIV risk compared to nonorphans, and much of this is likely related to vertical transmission. We found no evidence that provision of school fees to orphans will reduce their risk of HIV infection relative to nonorphans but further evidence that such programs may reduce risk behaviors including early sexual debut, child marriage, and school dropout. Further research is needed to determine how these programs can be sustainably scaled-up in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Adolescent Health ServicesHIV InfectionsRisk-TakingSchool Health ServicesAdolescentChild, OrphanedChild WelfareFemaleHealth SurveysHumansRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsZimbabweadolescentsfemalesHIV riskorphansZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID25930236
PMCPMC4596747
OpenAlexW1608455802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.