Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25930214›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular therapeutics2015

Contraindications to anticoagulation therapy and eligibility for novel anticoagulants in older patients with atrial fibrillation.

Benjamin A Steinberg, Melissa A Greiner, Bradley G Hammill, Lesley H Curtis, Emelia J Benjamin, Susan R Heckbert, Jonathan P Piccini

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Antithrombotic therapy at the end-of-life-continue or stop?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Design and deployment of the STEEER-AF trial to evaluate and improve guideline adherence: a cluster-randomized trial by the European Society of Cardiology and European Heart Rhythm Association.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Atrial fibrillation: trends in prevalence and antithrombotic prescriptions in the community.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin A SteinbergDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4729-7820
Melissa A GreinerDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Bradley G HammillDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Lesley H CurtisDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Emelia J BenjaminFramingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts, USA.
Susan R HeckbertDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jonathan P PicciniDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke University · USClinical Research Institute · USBoston University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

IDENTIFICATION OF COMMON GENETIC VARIANTS FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND PR INTERVALR01HL092577 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BENJAMIN, EMELIA J., ELLINOR, PATRICK THOMAS · 2009 to 2025
$20.6M
MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEART &VASCULAR DISEASEST32HL007101 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FREEDMAN, NEIL J. · 1985 to 2020
$9.8M
Aging and Inflammation: Longitudinal Markers and Genetics in the Framingham StudyR01AG028321 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BENJAMIN, EMELIA J. · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
Patterns of Health Care Use, Treatment & Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation: PATH-AFR01HL102214 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENJAMIN, EMELIA J., CURTIS, LESLEY H · 2010 to 2012
$1.4M
Risk prediction of atrial fibrillation: clinical, biological and genetic markersRC1HL101056 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ALONSO, ALVARO, BENJAMIN, EMELIA J. · 2009 to 2010
$967k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092577NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL092577NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL102214NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL102214NHLBI NIH HHS RC1 HL101056NHLBI NIH HHS RC1HL101056NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007101NHLBI NIH HHS T32HL007101NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028321NIA NIH HHS R01AG028321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsOral anticoagulation therapy prevents stroke and improves survival in patients with atrial fibrillation, but the therapy is underutilized. We sought to identify the prevalence of contraindications for oral anticoagulation and the proportion of patients potentially eligible for different agents.

methodsWe identified patients with nonacute atrial fibrillation in a nationally representative 5% sample of 2009 Medicare data. We divided the population into patients ineligible for any oral anticoagulant, patients eligible for warfarin only, and patients eligible for any anticoagulant. We compared patient characteristics and the use of anticoagulation among the subgroups.

resultsAmong 86,671 patients with atrial fibrillation, 1872 (2.2%) were ineligible for anticoagulation because of an absolute contraindication, most frequently a history of intracranial hemorrhage (60%). Patients ineligible for any anticoagulant were the same age as the overall group (mean age, 80.5 vs. 80.4 years). However, they had higher rates of dementia (19% vs. 8.6%) and heart failure (59% vs. 43%) and higher mean CHADS2 scores (3.8 vs. 2.8). Of the remaining 84,799 patients eligible for anticoagulation, 7146 (8.4%) were eligible for warfarin only (most commonly because of mechanical heart valves [66%] and end-stage renal disease [12%]). Sixty-five percent of patients eligible for anticoagulation received warfarin, and the proportion was similar for patients with a relatively high risk of bleeding.

conclusionsOlder adults with atrial fibrillation rarely have absolute contraindications to oral anticoagulation therapy. Among patients without contraindications, most appeared to be eligible for any anticoagulant, and relatively high-risk features appeared not to influence warfarin use.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsEligibility DeterminationPatient SelectionWarfarinAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAtrial FibrillationBlood CoagulationComorbidityContraindicationsFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleAnticoagulantsWarfarinAtrial fibrillationContraindicationsMedicarexOlder patientsOral anticoagulation

Identifiers

PMID25930214
PMCPMC4497930
OpenAlexW2060865513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.