Trial reportPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2015
Participation in Training for Depression Care Quality Improvement: A Randomized Trial of Community Engagement or Technical Support.
Trial report in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CPIC is a Community Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) Project of Community and Academic Partners Working Together to Learn the Best Way to Reduce Depression in Our Communities.
Resilience Against Depression Disparities (Also Known as Resilience Education to Reduce Depression Disparities)
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Engaging Community Networks to Improve Depression Services: A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Community Engagement and Planning Intervention.Community mental health journal · 2021Trial
- Improving Depression Care for Adults With Serious Mental Illness in Underresourced Areas: Community Coalitions Versus Technical Support.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2018Trial
- Community Partners in Care: 6- and 12-month Outcomes of Community Engagement versus Technical Assistance to Implement Depression Collaborative Care among Depressed Older Adults.Ethnicity & disease · 2018Trial
- 12-Month Cost Outcomes of Community Engagement Versus Technical Assistance for Depression Quality Improvement: A Partnered, Cluster Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.Ethnicity & disease · 2018Trial
- Comparative Effectiveness of Coalitions Versus Technical Assistance for Depression Quality Improvement in Persons with Multiple Chronic Conditions.Ethnicity & disease · 2018Trial
- A Community-Partnered, Participatory, Cluster-Randomized Study of Depression Care Quality Improvement: Three-Year Outcomes.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2017Trial
- The Effects of Collaborative Care Training on Case Managers' Perceived Depression-Related Services Delivery.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2017Trial
- Community Partners in Care: 6-Month Outcomes of Two Quality Improvement Depression Care Interventions in Male Participants.Ethnicity & disease · 2017Trial
- Community Engagement Compared With Technical Assistance to Disseminate Depression Care Among Low-Income, Minority Women: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Study.American journal of public health · 2016Trial
- The Impact of Community Engagement on Health, Social, and Utilization Outcomes in Depressed, Impoverished Populations: Secondary Findings from a Randomized Trial.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMTrial
- Effect of a needs-based model of care on the characteristics of healthcare services in England: the i-THRIVE National Implementation Programme.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2025Article
- Development of a computerized adaptive substance use disorder scale for screening and measurement: the CAT-SUD.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2020Article
- Outcomes of two quality improvement implementation interventions for depression services in adults with substance use problems.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2020Article
- Article
- Preparedness and Community Resilience in Disaster-Prone Areas: Cross-Sectoral Collaborations in South Louisiana, 2018.American journal of public health · 2019Article
- A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Depression Collaborative Care: Subanalysis of Comorbid Anxiety.Western journal of nursing research · 2019Article
- Depression Remission From Community Coalitions Versus Individual Program Support for Services: Findings From Community Partners in Care, Los Angeles, California, 2010-2016.American journal of public health · 2019Article
- Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity.Current psychiatry reports · 2019Review
- Community Resilience Learning Collaborative and Research Network (C-LEARN): Study Protocol with Participatory Planning for a Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCommunity engagement and planning (CEP) could improve dissemination of depression care quality improvement in underresourced communities, but whether its effects on provider training participation differ from those of standard technical assistance, or resources for services (RS), is unknown. This study compared program- and staff-level participation in depression care quality improvement training among programs enrolled in CEP, which trained networks of health care and social-community agencies jointly, and RS, which provided technical support to individual programs.
methodsMatched programs from health care and social-community service sectors in two communities were randomly assigned to RS or CEP. Data were from 1,622 eligible staff members from 95 enrolled programs. Primary outcomes were any staff trained (for programs) and total hours of training (for staff). Secondary staff-level outcomes were hours of training in specific depression collaborative care components.
resultsCEP programs were more likely than RS programs to participate in any training (p=.006). Within health care sectors, CEP programs were more likely than RS programs to participate in training (p=.016), but within social-community sectors, there was no difference in training by intervention. Among staff who participated in training, mean training hours were greater among CEP programs versus RS programs for any type of training (p<.001) and for training related to each component of depression care (p<.001) except medication management.
conclusionsCEP may be an effective strategy to promote staff participation in depression care improvement efforts in underresourced communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.