GuidelineEuropean radiology2015
ESR/ERS white paper on lung cancer screening.
Guideline in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Test performance metrics for breast, cervical, colon, and lung cancer screening: a systematic review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Pooled it
- Quality of smoking cessation advice in guidelines of tobacco-related diseases: An updated systematic review.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2020Pooled it
- Recommendations from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) regarding computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Europe.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2017Guideline
- Trial
- Organized Lung Cancer Screening of Subjects Occupationally Exposed to Lung Carcinogens: The LUng Cancer Screening Occupational exposure Study Entry Findings.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Low-Dose CT Quality Assurance at Scale: Automated Detection of Overscanning, Underscanning, and Image Noise.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prevalent findings on low-dose CT scan lung cancer screening: a French prospective pilot study.European journal of public health · 2025Article
- A Predictive Model Integrating AI Recognition Technology and Biomarkers for Lung Nodule Assessment.The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon · 2025Article
- Pulmonary nodule detection in low dose computed tomography using a medical-to-medical transfer learning approach.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- HUNCHEST projects-advancing low-dose CT lung cancer screening in Hungary.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2024Review
- Advancements and Challenges in the Image-Based Diagnosis of Lung and Colon Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Cancer informatics · 2024Review
- Recruitment strategies and interventions to increase participation in lung cancer screening programmes: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Comorbidity of COPD and Lung Cancer: Research Status and Future Directions.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Article
- Malignant Nodules Detected on Lung Cancer Screening CT: Yield of Short-Term Follow-Up CT in Showing Nodule Growth.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2022Article
- The Use of Breath Analysis in the Management of Lung Cancer: Is It Ready for Primetime?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Deep Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2022Review
- European lung cancer screening: valuable trial evidence for optimal practice implementation.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in the thorax: a narrative review focusing on thoracic radiology.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Review
- Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System.Translational lung cancer research · 2021Review
- Lung cancer screening in patients with previous malignancy: Is this cohort at increased risk for malignancy?European radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledLung cancer is the most frequently fatal cancer, with poor survival once the disease is advanced. Annual low-dose computed tomography has shown a survival benefit in screening individuals at high risk for lung cancer. Based on the available evidence, the European Society of Radiology and the European Respiratory Society recommend lung cancer screening in comprehensive, quality-assured, longitudinal programmes within a clinical trial or in routine clinical practice at certified multidisciplinary medical centres. Minimum requirements include: standardised operating procedures for low-dose image acquisition, computer-assisted nodule evaluation, and positive screening results and their management; inclusion/exclusion criteria; expectation management; and smoking cessation programmes. Further refinements are recommended to increase quality, outcome and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening: inclusion of risk models, reduction of effective radiation dose, computer-assisted volumetric measurements and assessment of comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and vascular calcification). All these requirements should be adjusted to the regional infrastructure and healthcare system, in order to exactly define eligibility using a risk model, nodule management and a quality assurance plan. The establishment of a central registry, including a biobank and an image bank, and preferably on a European level, is strongly encouraged. KEY POINTS: • Lung cancer screening using low dose computed tomography reduces mortality. • Leading US medical societies recommend large scale screening for high-risk individuals. • There are no lung cancer screening recommendations or reimbursed screening programmes in Europe as of yet. • The European Society of Radiology and the European Respiratory Society recommend lung cancer screening within a clinical trial or in routine clinical practice at certified multidisciplinary medical centres. • High risk, eligible individuals should be enrolled in comprehensive, quality-controlled longitudinal programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.