ArticleMedicine2015
Diagnostic pitfalls of discriminating lymphoma-associated effusions.
Article in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying Thoracic Malignancies Through Pleural Fluid Biomarkers: A Predictive Multivariate Model.Medicine · 2016Trial
- Clinical characteristics of chylothorax: results from the International Collaborative Effusion database.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Pleural Effusions in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Clinical and Prognostic Significance.Lung · 2019Article
- Hematolymphoid neoplasms in effusion cytology.CytoJournal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, immunologic defects, enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes, and frequent hydration and diuresis in lymphoma patients may affect the development of pleural effusion (PE). The study was to assess the clinical utility of "Light criteria" and the "recommended algorithm for investigating PEs" in patients with lymphoma.The characteristics of 126 PEs of lymphoma patients who underwent diagnostic thoracentesis between January 1, 2003, and April 30, 2012, were reviewed. Using Light criteria, 29 (23%) PEs were incorrectly classified. The sensitivity for exudates in Light criteria was 88% and the specificity was only 44%. In 32 transudates, PE LDH correlated with blood LDH concentration (P < 0.001, r = 0.66). Nine transudates were misclassified as exudates (50%; 9/18) just due to PE LDH more than two-thirds the upper limits. Among the 56 bilateral PEs, 33 (59%) were exudates. Ten (63%) polymorphonuclear (PMN)-predominant exudative PEs were malignant. Infective PEs were often mononuclear (67%) rather than PMN predominant.When a patient has lymphoma with either unilateral or bilateral PE, thoracentesis for microbiological testing and cytology is imperative. Carefully clinical correlation in addition to the result from Light criteria and differential cell count is essential for prompt management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.