Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25929840›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2015

A pilot randomized controlled trial of a stepped care intervention package for depression in primary care in Nigeria.

Bibilola D Oladeji, Lola Kola, Taiwo Abiona, Alan A Montgomery, Ricardo Araya, Oye Gureje

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bibilola D OladejiDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. bibideji@yahoo.com.
Lola KolaDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. lola_kola2004@yahoo.com.
Taiwo AbionaDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. abiona.taiwo@yahoo.com.
Alan A MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Nottingham Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. alan.montgomery@nottingham.ac.uk.
Ricardo ArayaCentre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. ricardo.araya@lshtm.ac.uk.
Oye GurejeDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. oye_gureje@yahoo.com.
University of Ibadan · NGLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is common in primary care and is often unrecognized and untreated. Studies are needed to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing evidence-based depression care provided by primary health care workers (PHCWs) in sub-Saharan Africa. We carried out a pilot two-parallel arm cluster randomized controlled trial of a package of care for depression in primary care.

methodsSix primary health care centers (PHCC) in two Local Government Areas of Oyo State, South West Nigeria were randomized into 3 intervention and 3 control clinics. Three PHCWs were selected for training from each of the participating clinics. The PHCWs from the intervention clinics were trained to deliver a manualized multicomponent stepped care intervention package for depression consisting of psychoeducation, activity scheduling, problem solving treatment and medication for severe depression. Providers from the control clinics delivered care as usual, enhanced by a refresher training on depression diagnosis and management. Outcome measures Patient's Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), WHO quality of Life instrument (WHOQOL-Bref) and the WHO disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) were administered in the participants' home at baseline, 3 and 6 months.

resultsAbout 98% of the consecutive attendees to the clinics agreed to have the screening interview. Of those screened, 284 (22.7%) were positive (PHQ-9 score ≥ 8) and 234 gave consent for inclusion in the study: 165 from intervention and 69 from control clinics. The rates of eligible and consenting participants were similar in the control and intervention arms. In all 85.9% (92.8% in intervention and 83% in control) of the participants were successfully administered outcome assessments at 6 months. The PHCWs had little difficulty in delivering the intervention package. At 6 months follow up, depression symptoms had improved in 73.0% from the intervention arm compared to 51.6% control. Compared to the mean scores at baseline, there was improvement in the mean scores on all outcome measures in both arms at six months.

conclusionThe results provide support for the feasibility of conducting a fully-powered randomized study in this setting and suggest that the instruments used may have the potential to detect differences between the arms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN46754188 (ISRTCN registry at isrtcn.com); registered 23 September 2013, details of the pilot study added 12/02/2015.

Indexed as

AdultCombined Modality TherapyDepressionFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25929840
PMCPMC4424568
OpenAlexW1973368176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.