ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2015
Tailoring of self-management interventions in patients with heart failure.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Electronic Health Self-Management Interventions for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Self-Management Interventions for Individuals with Low Health Literacy and/or Low Income: A Descriptive Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Do Self-Management Interventions Work in Patients With Heart Failure? An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.Circulation · 2016Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of an Empowerment-Based Self-care Education Program on Health Outcomes Among Patients With Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Effects of a home-based activation intervention on self-management adherence and readmission in rural heart failure patients: the PATCH randomized controlled trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2016Trial
- Self-Care Agency in Cardiovascular Care: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Interplay Between Self-Efficacy, Loneliness and Physical Activity.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Unveiling Heart Failure: Gender-Specific Insights and Innovations in Women's Cardiac Health.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- A qualitative exploration of the educational needs of people living with heart failure: BANDAIDD-Explore study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Knowledge about self-efficacy and outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.European journal of heart failure · 2023Article
- Designing a Future eHealth Service for Posthospitalization Self-management Support in Long-term Illness: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Article
- Needs and problems related to sociodemographic factors of informal caregiving of people with heart failure: A mixed methods study in three European countries.Journal of advanced nursing · 2022Article
- Development of Core Educational Content for Heart Failure Patients in Transition from Hospital to Home Care: A Delphi Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Patient Activation: The Cornerstone of Effective Self-Management in Chronic Kidney Disease?Kidney and dialysis · 2022Article
- People's preferences for self-management support.Health services research · 2022Article
- Feasibility of a Sensor-Controlled Digital Game for Heart Failure Self-management: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR serious games · 2021Article
- Barriers to Self-care Among Patients with Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study.Journal of caring sciences · 2021Article
- Interventions to Support Behavioral Self-Management of Chronic Diseases.Annual review of public health · 2019Review
- An exploration of learning needs: identifying knowledge deficits among hospitalized adults with heart failure.AIMS public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness of heart failure (HF) self-management interventions varies within patients suggesting that one size does not fit all. It is expected that effectiveness can be optimized when interventions are tailored to individual patients. The aim of this review was to synthesize the literature on current use of tailoring in self-management interventions and patient characteristics associated with self-management capacity and success of interventions, as building blocks for tailoring. Within available trials, the degree to which interventions are explicitly tailored is marginal and often limited to content. We found that certain patient characteristics that are associated with poor self-management capacity do not influence effectiveness of a given intervention (i.e., age, gender, ethnicity, disease severity, number of comorbidities) and that other characteristics (low: income, literacy, education, baseline self-management capacity) in fact are indicators of patients with a high likelihood for success. Increased scientific efforts are needed to continue unraveling success of self-management interventions and to validate the modifying impact of currently known patient characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.