Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25929452›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2015

Function of the M1 π-helix in endplate receptor activation and desensitization.

Prasad Purohit, Srirupa Chakraborty, Anthony Auerbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Understanding paralogous epilepsy-associated GABAProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Pathways for nicotinic receptor desensitization.The Journal of general physiology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prasad PurohitDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Srirupa ChakrabortyDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Anthony AuerbachDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.

Funding

MULTIPLE ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORSR37NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 2000 to 2013
$6.9M
Engineering a Transmitter Binding SiteR01NS064969 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 2009 to 2018
$4.1M
Multiple Activity Patterns of Acetylcholine ReceptorsR56NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 2014 to 2014
$530k
MULTIPLE ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORSR01NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 1987 to 1999
–
NINDS NIH HHS NS023513NINDS NIH HHS NS064969NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064969NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS023513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsA conserved proline in M1 causes a kink between α and π helical segments. The kink is under greater tension in the resting versus active conformation. The kink and the agonist do not interact directly. The π-helix separates the gating functions of the extracellular and transmembrane domains. Mutations of the conserved proline and propofol increase desensitization. ABSTRACT: Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) switch on/off to generate transient membrane currents (C↔O; closed-open 'gating') and enter/recover from long-lived, refractory states (O↔D; 'desensitization'). The M1 transmembrane helix of the muscle endplate AChR is linked to a β-strand of the extracellular domain that extends to a neurotransmitter binding site. We used electrophysiology to measure the effects of mutations of amino acids that are located at a proline kink in M1 that separates π and α helices, in both α (N217, V218 and P221) and non-α subunits. In related receptors, the kink is straighter and more stable in O vs. C structures (gating is 'spring-loaded'). None of the AChR kink mutations had a measureable effect on agonist affinity but many influenced the allosteric gating constant substantially. Side chains in the M1 α-helix experience extraordinarily large energy differences between C and O structures, probably because of a ∼2 Å displacement and tilt of M2 relative to M1. There is a discrete break in the character of the gating transition state between αN217 and αV218, indicating that the π-helix is a border between extracellular- and transmembrane-domain function. Mutations of the conserved M1 proline, and the anaesthetic propofol, increase a rate constant for desensitization. The results suggest that straightening of the M1 proline kink triggers AChR desensitization.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingAcetylcholineAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesHEK293 CellsHumansMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingProtein SubunitsReceptors, NicotinicAcetylcholineProtein SubunitsReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID25929452
PMCPMC4506185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.