Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25929413›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2016

Can Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in nasopharyngeal brushings or whole blood predict recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic region? A prospective nationwide study of the Dutch Head and Neck Oncology Cooperative Group.

Sharon D Stoker, Maarten A Wildeman, Zlata Novalic, Renske Fles, Vincent van der Noort, Remco de Bree, Weibel W Braunius, Guido B van den Broek, Bas Kreike, Kenneth W Kross and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen 1 Variant Associated with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Defines the Sequence Criteria for Serologic Risk Prediction.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon D StokerDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten A WildemanDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Zlata NovalicDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Renske FlesDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent van der NoortDepartment of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Remco de BreeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Weibel W BrauniusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Guido B van den BroekDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bas KreikeDepartment of Radiotherapy, Institute for Radiation Oncology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Kenneth W KrossDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hedy JuwanaDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Octavia RamayantiDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sandra A W M VerkuijlenDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan Paul de BoerDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Astrid E GreijerDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap M MiddeldorpDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I Bing TanDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. I.Tan@nki.nl.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRadiotherapie Groep · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study estimated the value of quantitative measurements of EBV markers in the clinical management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area. The aim was to predict prognosis and detect recurrent and residual disease. In 72 patients, EBV DNA load in blood and nasopharyngeal brushes, and IgA VCA-p18 and EBNA1 in plasma were measured at different time points. At diagnosis and post-treatment, a cut-off value was used for detecting disease [positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value]. The markers were correlated as a continuous variable with tumor stage, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The Cox hazard ratio model assessed hazard ratios. At diagnosis, the markers were above the COV in 45, 92, 85 and 83 % of the patients, respectively. Post-treatment, DNA load test in blood and brush had the best discriminating power (blood DNA load test: PPV 39 % and NPV 97 %, brush for local disease: PPV 75 % and NPV 99 %). Post-treatment, DNA load in blood was the best predictor for OS and DFS [hazard ratio 3.2 (95 % CI 1.51-3.5) and 2.3 (95 % CI 1.72-5.8)]. Assessing the EBV DNA load in blood has significant prognostic value, although the clinical value is for discussion. The EBV DNA load in the brush might improve early detection of local failures post-treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalDNA, ViralEarly DiagnosisEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsEpstein-Barr Virus Nuclear AntigensFemaleHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualNetherlandsDNA, ViralEBV-encoded nuclear antigen 1Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear AntigensDiagnostic markersEpstein-Barr virusNasopharyngeal carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID25929413
OpenAlexW2094195166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.