Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25929335›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2015

Indications for prognostic gene expression profiling in early breast cancer.

Erin F Cobain, Daniel F Hayes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03503799 (Prospective Assessment of Disease Progression in Primary Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing EndoPredict® Gene Expression Testing - a Care Research Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03503799 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Assessment of Disease Progression in Primary Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing EndoPredict® Gene Expression Testing - a Care Research Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNorth Eastern German Society of Gynaecological OncologyRan2018 to 2032Enrolled1,191ConditionsPrimary Invasive Breast Cancer, Estrogen Receptor Positive Tumor, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negative TumorArmsObservation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Molecular Changes Accompanying Disease Progression.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Implementation of the 21-gene recurrence score test in the United States in 2011.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. SEOM clinical guidelines in early-stage breast cancer 2015.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin F CobainUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, 6312 CCC, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, SPC5942, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5942, USA, ecobain@med.umich.edu.
Daniel F Hayes
Michigan Center for Translational Pathology · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementBreast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. While breast cancer mortality has dropped substantially over the past three decades due to early detection and adjuvant systemic therapy (AST), the risk of recurrence is highly dependent upon numerous factors including tumor size, involvement of regional lymph nodes, histologic grade, expression of hormone receptors (estrogen and progesterone), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification. We use these factors to determine which early breast cancer (EBC) patients should be treated with AST, including endocrine therapy (ET), chemotherapy, and HER2-directed treatments. While these factors aid in this determination, it remains challenging to identify those patients unlikely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, resulting in over-treatment of patients. Given this dilemma, there has been great interest in the development of prognostic and predictive gene expression profiles. The most extensively studied profile, the 21-gene recurrence score (Oncotype Dx®), estimates 10-year risk of breast cancer recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative EBC and is likely predictive of chemotherapy benefit. This assay has established analytic validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility for this patient group and, therefore, is indicated in this patient population to help inform decisions regarding administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Several other assays may have utility in this clinical context or perhaps to identify patients who do not require extended adjuvant ET. These assays include the following: PAM 50 Risk of Recurrence (ROR) Score (Prosigna™), Breast Cancer Index, and EndoPredict®.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease ProgressionEarly Detection of CancerErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLymph NodesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID25929335
OpenAlexW2067065959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.