Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25929326›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2015

Affordable uniform isotope labeling with (2)H, (13)C and (15)N in insect cells.

Agnieszka Sitarska, Lukasz Skora, Julia Klopp, Susan Roest, César Fernández, Binesh Shrestha, Alvar D Gossert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improved strategy for isoleucineJournal of biomolecular NMR · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Current strategies for protein production and purification enabling membrane protein structural biology.Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Agnieszka SitarskaNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Lukasz Skora
Julia Klopp
Susan Roest
César Fernández
Binesh Shrestha
Alvar D Gossert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a wide range of proteins of high interest, the major obstacle for NMR studies is the lack of an affordable eukaryotic expression system for isotope labeling. Here, a simple and affordable protocol is presented to produce uniform labeled proteins in the most prevalent eukaryotic expression system for structural biology, namely Spodoptera frugiperda insect cells. Incorporation levels of 80% can be achieved for (15)N and (13)C with yields comparable to expression in full media. For (2)H,(15)N and (2)H,(13)C,(15)N labeling, incorporation is only slightly lower with 75 and 73%, respectively, and yields are typically twofold reduced. The media were optimized for isotope incorporation, reproducibility, simplicity and cost. High isotope incorporation levels for all labeling patterns are achieved by using labeled algal amino acid extracts and exploiting well-known biochemical pathways. The final formulation consists of just five commercially available components, at costs 12-fold lower than labeling media from vendors. The approach was applied to several cytosolic and secreted target proteins.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimalsCarbohydratesCarbon IsotopesInsect ProteinsIsotope LabelingNitrogen IsotopesNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularReproducibility of ResultsSpodopteraAmino AcidsCarbohydratesCarbon IsotopesInsect ProteinsNitrogen Isotopes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.