Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25929250›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2016

Efficacy and safety of nicoboxil/nonivamide ointment for the treatment of acute pain in the low back - A randomized, controlled trial.

M Gaubitz, T Schiffer, C Holm, E Richter, W Pisternick-Ruf, T Weiser

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pain (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M GaubitzInterdisciplinary Diagnostics and Therapy in the Academy for Manual Medicine, University Münster, Germany.
T SchifferOutpatient Clinic for Sports Traumatology and Public Health Consultation, German Sport University Cologne, Germany.
C HolmBoehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria.
E RichterBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim, Germany.
W Pisternick-RufBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
T WeiserBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim, Germany.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Austria) · ATGerman Sport University Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUntil now, nonivamide/nicoboxil ointment has not been tested in a randomized trial for the treatment of acute non-specific low back pain.

methodsThis phase III randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial investigated efficacy, safety and tolerability of topical nicoboxil 2.5%/nonivamide 0.4% for treatment of acute non-specific low back pain [primary endpoint: pain intensity (PI) difference between pre-dose baseline and 8 h after the first application].

resultsPatients (n = 805), 18-74 years of age were treated for up to 4 days with nicoboxil 2.5%/nonivamide 0.4%, nicoboxil 2.5%, nonivamide 0.4% or placebo ointment. Pre-dose baseline pain intensity (6.6 on a 0- to 10-point numerical rating scale) was reduced by 1.049 points with placebo, by 1.428 points with nicoboxil, by 2.252 points with nonivamide and by 2.410 points with nicoboxil/nonivamide after 8 h (p < 0.0001 for nicoboxil/nonivamide vs. placebo, nicoboxil; p = 0.4171 for nicoboxil/nonivamide vs. nonivamide). At the end of treatment, the combination provided more pronounced PI reduction (3.540 points) compared with nicoboxil (2.371, p < 0.0001), nonivamide (3.074, p = 0.0259) and placebo (1.884, p < 0.0001). Low back mobility scores on Day 1 were better for the combination compared with all other treatments (p < 0.044); on Day 2-4, scores were better than for placebo and nicoboxil (p < 0.003). Patients assessed efficacy of the combination as greater than of the comparators (p ≤ 0.0129). All treatments were tolerated well. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionNicoboxil/nonivamide ointment is an effective, well-tolerated medication for the treatment of acute non-specific low back pain.

Indexed as

Acute PainAdolescentAdultAgedCapsaicinDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedNicotinic AcidsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCapsaicinDrug CombinationsnicoboxilNicotinic Acidsnonivamide

Identifiers

PMID25929250
PMCPMC5029595
OpenAlexW2093386937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.