Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25928807›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Development and Validation of the Keele Musculoskeletal Patient Reported Outcome Measure (MSK-PROM).

Jonathan C Hill, Elaine Thomas, Susan Hill, Nadine E Foster, Danielle A van der Windt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Understanding data visualization techniques in qualitative studies used to develop and validate patient-reported outcome measures: a targeted literature review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity, reliability, and responsiveness.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan C HillInstitute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Elaine ThomasInstitute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Susan HillInstitute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Nadine E FosterInstitute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Danielle A van der WindtInstitute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-015Department of Health PB-PG-0909-20283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a patient report outcome measure (PROM) for clinical practice that can monitor health status of patients with a range of musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders.

methodsConstructs for inclusion in the MSK-PROM were identified from a consensus process involving patients with musculoskeletal conditions, clinicians, purchasers of healthcare services, and primary care researchers. Psychometric properties of the brief tool, including face and construct validity, repeatability and responsiveness were assessed in a sample of patients with musculoskeletal pain consulting physiotherapy services in the United Kingdom (n=425).

resultsThe consensus process identified 10 prioritised domains for monitoring musculoskeletal health status: pain intensity, quality of life, physical capacity, interference with social/leisure activities, emotional well-being, severity of most difficult thing, activities and roles, understanding independence, and overall impact. As the EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) is a widely adopted PROMs tool and covers the first four domains listed, to reduce patient burden to a minimum the MSK-PROM was designed to capture the remaining six prioritised domains which are not measured by the EQ-5D-5L. The tool demonstrated excellent reliability, construct validity, responsiveness and acceptability to patients and clinicians for use in clinical practice.

conclusionWe have validated a brief patient reported outcome measure (MSK-PROM) for use in clinical practice to measure musculoskeletal health status and monitor outcomes over time using domains that are meaningful to patients and sensitive to change. Further work will establish whether the MSK-PROM is useful in other musculoskeletal healthcare settings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesMusculoskeletal PainPatient Outcome AssessmentPsychometricsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25928807
PMCPMC4415910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.