Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25928744›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Task type affects location of language-positive cortical regions by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping.

Theresa Hauck, Noriko Tanigawa, Monika Probst, Afra Wohlschlaeger, Sebastian Ille, Nico Sollmann, Stefanie Maurer, Claus Zimmer, Florian Ringel, Bernhard Meyer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Theresa HauckDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Noriko TanigawaFaculty of Linguistics, Philology, and Phonetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Monika ProbstSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Afra WohlschlaegerSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian IlleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Nico SollmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Stefanie MaurerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Claus ZimmerSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Florian RingelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Sandro M KriegDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRecent repetitive TMS (rTMS) mapping protocols for language mapping revealed deficits of this method, mainly in posterior brain regions. Therefore this study analyzed the impact of different language tasks on the localization of language-positive brain regions and compared their effectiveness, especially with regard to posterior brain regions.

methodsNineteen healthy, right-handed subjects performed object naming, pseudoword reading, verb generation, and action naming during rTMS language mapping of the left hemisphere. Synchronically, 5 Hz/10 pulses were applied with a 0 ms delay.

resultsThe object naming task evoked the highest error rate (14%), followed by verb generation (13%) and action naming (11%). The latter revealed more errors in posterior than in anterior areas. Pseudoword reading barely generated errors, except for phonological paraphasias.

conclusionsIn general, among the evaluated language tasks, object naming is the most discriminative task to detect language-positive regions via rTMS. However, other tasks might be used for more specific questions.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansLanguageMaleReadingTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID25928744
PMCPMC4415771
OpenAlexW1998378563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.