ArticlePLoS genetics2015
Imputation-based population genetics analysis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Wide Analysis of the Malaria ParasiteFrontiers in immunology · 2020Trial
- CTNNB1 Genetic Variation and Its Interaction With DLK1 in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- Towards an evolutionary baseline model ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genomic Selection for Early Growth Traits in Inner Mongolian Cashmere Goats Using ABLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP Methods.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- KRT23 as a Potential Target for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD): Evidence From Bioinformatics Analysis, Human Gene Polymorphism and Animal Experiments.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Rapid profiling of Plasmodium parasites from genome sequences to assist malaria control.Genome medicine · 2023Article
- Geographical classification of malaria parasites through applying machine learning to whole genome sequence data.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Genome-wide SNP analysis ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Characterizing the genomic variation and population dynamics of Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites in and around Lake Victoria, Kenya.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Using deep learning to identify recent positive selection in malaria parasite sequence data.Malaria journal · 2021Article
- An open dataset ofWellcome open research · 2021Article
- Plasmodium vivax Malaria Viewed through the Lens of an Eradicated European Strain.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Falciparum malaria from coastal Tanzania and Zanzibar remains highly connected despite effective control efforts on the archipelago.Malaria journal · 2020Article
- Estimating Relatedness Between Malaria Parasites.Genetics · 2019Article
- An analysis of large structural variation in global Plasmodium falciparum isolates identifies a novel duplication of the chloroquine resistance associated gene.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis of Genetic Diversity inFrontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Article
- Proteome-wide mapping of immune features onto Plasmodium protein three-dimensional structures.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Analysis of nuclear and organellar genomes of Plasmodium knowlesi in humans reveals ancient population structure and recent recombination among host-specific subpopulations.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Genome-wide diversity and differentiation in New World populations of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing technologies are being increasingly applied to Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates to identify genetic determinants of malaria pathogenesis. However, genome-wide discovery methods, such as haplotype scans for signatures of natural selection, are hindered by missing genotypes in sequence data. Poor correlation between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the P. falciparum genome complicates efforts to apply established missing-genotype imputation methods that leverage off patterns of linkage disequilibrium (LD). The accuracy of state-of-the-art, LD-based imputation methods (IMPUTE, Beagle) was assessed by measuring allelic r2 for 459 P. falciparum samples from malaria patients in 4 countries: Thailand, Cambodia, Gambia, and Malawi. In restricting our analysis to 86 k high-quality SNPs across the populations, we found that the complete-case analysis was restricted to 21k SNPs (24.5%), despite no single SNP having more than 10% missing genotypes. The accuracy of Beagle in filling in missing genotypes was consistently high across all populations (allelic r2, 0.87-0.96), but the performance of IMPUTE was mixed (allelic r2, 0.34-0.99) depending on reference haplotypes and population. Positive selection analysis using Beagle-imputed haplotypes identified loci involved in resistance to chloroquine (crt) in Thailand, Cambodia, and Gambia, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (dhfr, dhps) in Cambodia, and artemisinin (kelch13) in Cambodia. Tajima's D-based analysis identified genes under balancing selection that encode well-characterized vaccine candidates: apical merozoite antigen 1 (ama1) and merozoite surface protein 1 (msp1). In contrast, the complete-case analysis failed to identify any well-validated drug resistance or candidate vaccine loci, except kelch13. In a setting of low LD and modest levels of missing genotypes, using Beagle to impute P. falciparum genotypes is a viable strategy for conducting accurate large-scale population genetics and association analyses, and supporting global surveillance for drug resistance markers and candidate vaccine antigens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.