ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Ten simple rules for a successful cross-disciplinary collaboration.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cross-disciplinary research framework at institution level and beyond.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for computational biologists collaborating with wet lab researchers.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for writing a PLOS Computational Biology quick tips article.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Ten quick tips for fuzzy logic modeling of biomedical systems.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules to ruin a collaborative environment.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Darwinian genomics and diversity in the tree of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Applied Bioinformatics and Public Health Microbiology: challenges, discoveries and innovations during a pandemic.Microbial genomics · 2022Article
- Ten simple rules to cultivate transdisciplinary collaboration in data science.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Interdisciplinary Research in Alzheimer's Disease and the Roles International Societies Can Play.Aging and disease · 2021Article
- Computational Stem Cell Biology: Open Questions and Guiding Principles.Cell stem cell · 2021Review
- Neuronal Graphs: A Graph Theory Primer for Microscopic, Functional Networks of Neurons Recorded by Calcium Imaging.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Review
- Twelve quick steps for genome assembly and annotation in the classroom.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Development of a Peer Education Program to Improve Concussion Knowledge and Reporting in Collegiate Athletes.Journal of athletic training · 2020Article
- Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Perspectives: On the Road to a Holistic Approach to Dementia Prevention and Care.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2020Review
- How has Internet Addiction been Tracked Over the Last Decade? A Literature Review andInternational journal of preventive medicine · 2020Review
- BEAMS: a workforce development program to bridge the gap between biologists and material scientists.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- One Health and Antibiotic Resistance in Agroecosystems.EcoHealth · 2019Article
- Ten simple rules for international short-term research stays.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Ten simple rules for surviving an interdisciplinary PhD.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.