Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25928118›Full record

Trial reportCancer biology & therapy2015

A phase II clinical trial of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in combination with panitumumab in metastatic triple negative breast cancer.

S Cowherd, L D Miller, S A Melin, S Akman, S Isom, J Cole, A Pullikuth, J A Lawrence

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer biology & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. [Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. FTY720/Fingolimod mitigates paclitaxel-induced Sparcl1-driven neuropathic pain and breast cancer progression.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. CAPE-Frontiers in oncology · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S Cowherda Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center ; Winston-Salem , NC USA.
L D Miller
S A Melin
S Akman
S Isom
J Cole
A Pullikuth
J A Lawrence
Winston-Salem State University · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USUniversity of New Orleans · US

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWomen with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) can have a poor prognosis with treatment limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The identification of effective therapies that may limit exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy and lead to prolonged survival is an unmet medical need. We tested an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor, panitumumab in combination with chemotherapy.

methodsWe conducted a single arm clinical trial in women with metastatic or locally advanced TNBC to paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC of 2 on days 1, 8, and 15 and panitumumab 6 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 for a cycle length of 28 days. The objectives were to evaluate the response rate and safety of the combination in comparison to historical controls.

resultsFourteen patients with TNBC were enrolled with a median age of 53 years. The majority of women were African American (64.3%) with visceral metastasis (64.2%). Hematologic toxicities, particularly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, were a major cause of missed chemotherapy and delayed treatment in this study. The overall response rate (complete and partial response) of the 13 evaluable patients was 46%. The median time to best response was 2.4 months and the median time to disease progression was 3.6 months. We were able to perform the PAM50 analysis on tumors from 7 of our subjects. All the samples tested clustered within the basal-like subtype.

conclusionsIn our experience the response rate of carboplatin, paclitaxel and panitumumab was consistent with other reports of response for cytotoxic chemotherapy in metastatic TNBC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiddle AgedPaclitaxelPanitumumabTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalCarboplatinErbB ReceptorsPaclitaxelPanitumumabAUC, area under the curveCR, complete responseEGFR, Epidermal growth factor inhibitorepidermal growth factor inhibitorFISH, Fluorescence in situ hybridizationg/dl, grams/deciliterHgb, hemoglobinIHC, immunohistochemistryIRB, Institutional Review Boardmetastatic breast cancerMg/dl, milligram/deciliterMg/kg, milligram/kilogrampacliataxel carboplatinPD, progressive diseasePR, partial responseRECIST, response evaluation in sold tumorsTNBC, triple negative breast cancertriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID25928118
PMCPMC4622683
OpenAlexW1791486331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.