ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2015
Patient Preferences versus Family Physicians' Perceptions Regarding the Place of End-of-Life Care and Death: A Nationwide Study in Taiwan.
Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging policy and practice: Determinants of place of death for palliative care recipients in Taiwan.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Mediating effects of positive coping styles among oncology nurses between psychological resilience and professional grief: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- A laboratory-less nomogram predicting survival rates for hospice patients with advanced cancer.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Predictive value of venous bicarbonate levels for survival to hospital discharge in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Identification of Nursing Outcomes and Quality Indicators for Home Health Care in Older Adults with End-Stage Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Factors Related to the Choice of Place of Death in Deceased Patients due to Cancer from 2011 to 2017 with Hospitalization Background in Firoozgar Hospital.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- A Review of the Current State of Hospice Care in China.Current oncology reports · 2020Review
- The characteristics of advanced cancer patients followed at home, but admitted to the hospital for the last days of life.Internal and emergency medicine · 2016Article
- Readmissions in Cancer Patients After Receiving Inpatient Palliative Care in Taiwan: A 9-Year Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.Medicine · 2016Article
- Providing Palliative Care in Rural Nepal: Perceptions of Mid-Level Health Workers.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
- The Hospice Information System and its association with the congruence between the preferred and actual place of death.Tzu chi medical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnabling people to die in their preferred place is important for providing high-quality end-of-life care.
objectiveThe study objective was to explore patients' preferences regarding the place of end-of-life care and death and to compare these preferences with the perceptions of their family physicians.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used stratified random sampling, surveying 400 registered patients and 200 of their family physicians nationwide, with a five-part, structured, self-report questionnaire.
resultsOf the selected population, 310 patients (response rate 77.5%) and 169 physicians (response rate 84.5%) responded. Regarding the preferred place for end-of-life care, most of the patients would choose to receive care at home (60.6%) if home care services were available. Additionally, home was the most frequently preferred (66.5%) place of death. The family physicians' survey showed that a higher proportion of physicians selected home as the preferred place for end-of-life care and death (71.6% and 87.2%, respectively). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that patients younger than 50 years of age who believed in Chinese folk religion and who resided in a rural area were more likely to prefer to die at home.
conclusionsThe most commonly preferred place for end-of-life care and death is the patient's home. Establishing a community-based palliative care system should be encouraged to allow more individuals to die in their preferred locations. There were discrepancies in the preferred place of end-of-life care and death between the patients' preferences and their family physicians' perceptions. More effective physician-patient communication regarding end-of-life care is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.