Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25927429›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

Underestimation of foraging behaviour by standard field methods in malaria vector mosquitoes in southern Africa.

Smita Das, Tyler C Henning, Limonty Simubali, Harry Hamapumbu, Lukwa Nzira, Edmore Mamini, Aramu Makuwaza, Mbanga Muleba, Douglas E Norris, Jennifer C Stevenson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Habitat Partitioning of Malaria Vectors in Nchelenge District, Zambia.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Smita DasThe W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. sdas17@jhu.edu.
Tyler C HenningThe W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. thennin4@jhu.edu.
Limonty SimubaliMacha Research Trust, P.O. Box 630166, Choma, Zambia. limonty.simubali@macharesearch.org.
Harry HamapumbuMacha Research Trust, P.O. Box 630166, Choma, Zambia. harry.hamapumbu@macharesearch.org.
Lukwa NziraNational Institute of Health Research, P.O. Box 573, Harare, Zimbabwe. nziraa33@yahoo.co.uk.
Edmore MaminiBiomedical Research Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe. edmoremamini@gmail.com.
Aramu MakuwazaNational Institute of Health Research, P.O. Box 573, Harare, Zimbabwe. aramumakuwaza@gmail.com.
Mbanga MulebaTropical Disease Research Centre, Ndola, Zambia. mulebam@tdrc.org.zm.
Douglas E NorrisThe W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. dnorris3@jhu.edu.
Jennifer C StevensonMacha Research Trust, P.O. Box 630166, Choma, Zambia. jennyc.stevenson@macharesearch.org.
Southern Africa ICEMR Team

Funding

TransmissionU19AI089680 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM J MOSS · 2010 to 2026
$25.6M
Training: Molecular & Cellular Bases of Infectious DiseasesT32AI007417 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Arturo Casadevall · 1994 to 2026
$11.9M
NIAID NIH HHS 2T32AI007417-16NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007417NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefining the anopheline mosquito vectors and their foraging behaviour in malaria endemic areas is crucial for disease control and surveillance. The standard protocol for molecular identification of host blood meals in mosquitoes is to morphologically identify fed mosquitoes and then perform polymerase chain reaction (PCR), precipitin tests, or ELISA assays. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the feeding rate and human blood indices (HBIs) of malaria vectors were underestimated when molecular confirmation by PCR was performed on both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes.

methodsIn association with the Southern Africa International Centers of Excellence in Malaria Research (ICEMR), mosquito collections were performed at three sites: Choma district in southern Zambia, Nchelenge district in northern Zambia, and Mutasa district in eastern Zimbabwe. All anophelines were classified visually as fed or unfed, and tested for blood meal species using PCR methods. The HBIs of visually fed mosquitoes were compared to the HBIs of overall PCR confirmed fed mosquitoes by Pearson's Chi-Square Test of Independence.

resultsThe mosquito collections consisted of Anopheles arabiensis from Choma, Anopheles funestus s.s., Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles leesoni from Nchelenge, and An. funestus s.s. and An. leesoni from Mutasa. The malaria vectors at all three sites had large human blood indices (HBI) suggesting high anthropophily. When only visually fed mosquitoes tested by PCR for blood meal species were compared to testing those classified as both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes, it was found that the proportion blooded was underestimated by up to 18.7%. For most Anopheles species at each site, there was a statistically significant relationship (P < 0.05) between the HBIs of visually fed mosquitoes and that of the overall PCR confirmed fed mosquitoes.

conclusionThe impact on HBI of analysing both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes varied from site to site. This discrepancy may be due to partial blood feeding behaviour by mosquitoes, digestion of blood meals, sample condition, and/or expertise of entomology field staff. It is important to perform molecular testing on all mosquitoes to accurately characterize vector feeding behaviour and develop interventions in malaria endemic areas.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAnimalsAnophelesDNAEntomologyFemaleHumansInsect VectorsPolymerase Chain ReactionZambiaZimbabweDNA

Identifiers

PMID25927429
PMCPMC4318541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.