Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25927380›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genetics2015

Clinical characterization of int22h1/int22h2-mediated Xq28 duplication/deletion: new cases and literature review.

Ayman W El-Hattab, Christian P Schaaf, Ping Fang, Elizabeth Roeder, Virginia E Kimonis, Joseph A Church, Ankita Patel, Sau Wai Cheung

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Deciphering a novel complex inversion affecting F8 in a family with severe haemophilia A by optical genome mapping.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. TheGenes · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Opposite Expression Patterns ofFrontiers in psychiatry · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ayman W El-HattabDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS NAB 2015, Houston, TX, 77030, U.S.A. elhattabaw@yahoo.com.
Christian P SchaafDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS NAB 2015, Houston, TX, 77030, U.S.A. schaaf@bcm.edu.
Ping FangDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS NAB 2015, Houston, TX, 77030, U.S.A. pfang@bcm.edu.
Elizabeth RoederSection of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Children's Hospital of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. roeder@bcm.edu.
Virginia E KimonisDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA. vkimonis@uci.edu.
Joseph A ChurchDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. jchurch@chla.usc.edu.
Ankita PatelDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS NAB 2015, Houston, TX, 77030, U.S.A. ankitap@bcm.edu.
Sau Wai CheungDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS NAB 2015, Houston, TX, 77030, U.S.A. scheung@bcm.edu.
Baylor College of Medicine · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USChildren's Hospital of San Antonio · USUniversity of California, Irvine Medical Center · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInt22h1/int22h2-mediated Xq28 duplication syndrome is caused by ~0.5 Mb chromosomal duplications mediated by nonallelic homologous recombination between intron 22 homologous region 1 (int22h1) and 2 (int22h2), which, in addition to int22h3, are also responsible for inversions disrupting the F8 gene in hemophilia A. This syndrome has recently been described in 9 males with cognitive impairment, behavioral problems, and distinctive facial features; and 6 females with milder phenotypes. The reciprocal deletion was previously reported in a mother and daughter. It was suggested that this deletion may not have phenotypic effects in females because of skewed chromosome X inactivation, but may be embryonic lethal in males.

methodsArray comparative genomic hybridization analyses were performed using oligonucleotide-based chromosomal microarray. Chromosome X inactivation studies were performed at the AR (androgen receptor) and FMR1 (fragile X mental retardation 1) loci.

resultsWe present here 5 males and 6 females with int22h1/int22h2-mediated Xq28 duplication syndrome. The males manifested cognitive impairment, behavioral problems, and distinctive facial features. Two of the six females manifested mild cognitive impairment. This duplication was maternally inherited, and skewed chromosome X inactivation was observed in the majority of females carrying the duplication. We also report the reciprocal deletion in a mother and daughter with overweight, but normal cognition. In addition, we present the first case of a prenatally diagnosed de novo int22h1/int22h2-mediated deletion in a healthy female infant. We reviewed individuals previously reported with similar or overlapping rearrangements and evaluated the potential roles of genes in the rearrangement region.

conclusionsThe similarity of clinical features among individuals with the int22h1/int22h2-mediated Xq28 duplication supports the notion that this duplication causes a recognizable syndrome that affects males with females exhibiting milder phenotypes. It is suggested that the observed cognitive impairment in this syndrome results from increased dosage of RAB39B gene located within the duplicated region. Increased dosage of CLIC2 may also contribute to the phenotype. The reciprocal deletion results in skewed chromosome X inactivation and no clinical phenotype in females. Review of overlapping deletions suggests that hemizygous loss of VBP1 may be the cause for the proposed male lethality associated with this deletion.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionChromosome DuplicationX Chromosome InactivationAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolChromosomes, Human, XFemaleHumansInfantIntronsMaleMiddle AgedPedigreeSex Chromosome Disorders

Identifiers

PMID25927380
PMCPMC4422130
OpenAlexW2047813205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.