Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25927233›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Extremely sparse olfactory inputs are sufficient to mediate innate aversion in Drosophila.

Xiaojing J Gao, Thomas R Clandinin, Liqun Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Response Plasticity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Structure and Function of Ionotropic Receptors inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaojing J GaoHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Thomas R ClandininDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Liqun LuoHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America; Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Stanford University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Assembly of the Central Olfactory Networks in DrosophilaR01DC005982 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIQUN LUO · 2003 to 2026
$8.1M
Dissecting Neural Circuit Computations in the Peripheral Visual SystemR01EY022638 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLANDININ, THOMAS ROBERT · 2012 to 2021
$3.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022638NEI NIH HHS R01-EY022638NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005982NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC005982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innate attraction and aversion to odorants are observed throughout the animal kingdom, but how olfactory circuits encode such valences is not well understood, despite extensive anatomical and functional knowledge. In Drosophila melanogaster, ~50 types of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) each express a unique receptor gene, and relay information to a cognate type of projection neurons (PNs). To examine the extent to which the population activity of ORNs is required for olfactory behavior, we developed a genetic strategy to block all ORN outputs, and then to restore output in specific types. Unlike attraction, aversion was unaffected by simultaneous silencing of many ORNs, and even single ORN types previously shown to convey neutral valence sufficed to mediate aversion. Thus, aversion may rely on specific activity patterns in individual ORNs rather than the number or identity of activated ORNs. ORN activity is relayed into the brain by downstream circuits, with excitatory PNs (ePN) representing a major output. We found that silencing the majority of ePNs did not affect aversion, even when ePNs directly downstream of single restored ORN types were silenced. Our data demonstrate the robustness of olfactory aversion, and suggest that its circuit mechanism is qualitatively different from attraction.

Indexed as

InstinctSmellAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGene ExpressionOdorantsOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory Receptor NeuronsSynaptic TransmissionTemperatureDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25927233
PMCPMC4416024
OpenAlexW2140124626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.