ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2015
Lung particle overload: old school -new insights?
Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of environmentally persistent free radical (EPFR) formation, characteristics, and health effects: are there sufficient data for risk assessment?Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Inhalation toxicity, pulmonary clearance, and biotransformation of ferric oxide nanoparticles in rats.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2026Article
- Readiness of theFrontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- Urban Particulate Matter Triggers Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Carcinogenicity of Poorly Soluble Low Toxicity Particles: Commentary on Epidemiology as a Risk Assessment "Reality Check".Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- Review of Lung Particle Overload, Rat Lung Cancer, and the Conclusions of the Edinburgh Expert Panel-It's Time to Revisit Cancer Hazard Classifications for Titanium Dioxide and Carbon Black.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- Aerogels are not regulated as nanomaterials, but can be assessed by tiered testing and grouping strategies for nanomaterials.Nanoscale advances · 2021Article
- The parallels between particle induced lung overload and particle induced periprosthetic osteolysis (PPOL).Open research Europe · 2021Review
- Biological effects of inhaled hydraulic fracturing sand dust. II. Particle characterization and pulmonary effects 30 d following intratracheal instillation.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2020Article
- Nearly free surface silanols are the critical molecular moieties that initiate the toxicity of silica particles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Article
- Grouping of Poorly Soluble Low (Cyto)Toxic Particles: Example with 15 Selected Nanoparticles and A549 Human Lung Cells.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Lobar evenness of deposition/retention in rat lungs of inhaled silver nanoparticles: an approach for reducing animal use while maximizing endpoints.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2019Article
- Nanoparticle decoration impacts airborne fungal pathobiology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Characterizing risk assessments for the development of occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2018Review
- Potential harmful elements in coal dust and human health risk assessment near the mining areas in Cherat, Pakistan.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
- Characteristics and properties of nano-LiCoOJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2017Article
- Biokinetics of Nanomaterials: the Role of Biopersistence.NanoImpact · 2017Article
- Endothelial responses of the alveolar barrier in vitro in a dose-controlled exposure to diesel exhaust particulate matter.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2017Article
- Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.Critical reviews in toxicology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.