SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015
Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03040960 (Risk Factors for Staphylococcus Aureus Surgical Site Infections in Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Risk Factors for Staphylococcus Aureus Surgical Site Infections in Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 517 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Recommendations for perioperative skin care in total joint arthroplasty: antimicrobial wash lotion, precleaning and hair removal].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Pooled it
- A meta-analysis examining the impact of intrawound treatment on reducing deep surgical site infections during instrumented spine surgery.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Nasal decontamination for the prevention of surgical site infection in Staphylococcus aureus carriers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Full-Body Versus Local Wipe Disinfection With Chlorhexidine Gluconate: No Difference in Surgical Site Infection After Acute Hip Fracture Surgery.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Preventing Surgical Site Infections: A Narrative Review of Antiseptic Solutions in the Operating Theatre.Cureus · 2025Review
- A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Antibiotic Prophylaxis versus No Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Postoperative Infectious Complications for Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025Article
- Main Operating Room Versus Field Sterility in Hand Surgery: A Review of the Evidence.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Evidence-based Approach for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection.Hip & pelvis · 2024Review
- Small animal patient preoperative preparation: a review of common antiseptics, comparison studies, and resistance.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- Measures to Prevent Infection in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Replacements or Upgrades.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Incidence rate and risk factors of surgical wound infection in general surgery patients: A cross-sectional study.International wound journal · 2023Article
- Perioperative Means to Prevent Surgical Site Infections following Elective Craniotomies: A Single-Center Experience.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Preoperative Decolonization Appears to Reduce the Risk of Infection in High-Risk Groups Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Chlorhexidine Resistance or Cross-Resistance, That Is the Question.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Clinical Evidence for the Use of Octenidine Dihydrochloride to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections and DecreasePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Surgical Site Infection in Cardiac Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Surgical site infection after open lower extremity revascularization associated with doubled rate of major limb amputation.Journal of vascular surgery · 2022Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical site infections (SSIs) are wound infections that occur after invasive (surgical) procedures. Preoperative bathing or showering with an antiseptic skin wash product is a well-accepted procedure for reducing skin bacteria (microflora). It is less clear whether reducing skin microflora leads to a lower incidence of surgical site infection.
objectivesTo review the evidence for preoperative bathing or showering with antiseptics for preventing hospital-acquired (nosocomial) surgical site infections. SEARCH
methodsFor this fifth update we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 18 December 2014); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2014 Issue 11); Ovid MEDLINE (2012 to December Week 4 2014), Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations December 18, 2014); Ovid EMBASE (2012 to 2014 Week 51), EBSCO CINAHL (2012 to December 18 2014) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing any antiseptic preparation used for preoperative full-body bathing or showering with non-antiseptic preparations in people undergoing surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed studies for selection, risk of bias and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN
resultsWe did not identify any new trials for inclusion in this fifth update. Seven trials involving a total of 10,157 participants were included. Four of the included trials had three comparison groups. The antiseptic used in all trials was 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (Hibiscrub/Riohex). Three trials involving 7791 participants compared chlorhexidine with a placebo. Bathing with chlorhexidine compared with placebo did not result in a statistically significant reduction in SSIs; the relative risk of SSI (RR) was 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.04). When only trials of high quality were included in this comparison, the RR of SSI was 0.95 (95%CI 0.82 to 1.10). Three trials of 1443 participants compared bar soap with chlorhexidine; when combined there was no difference in the risk of SSIs (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.84). Three trials of 1192 patients compared bathing with chlorhexidine with no washing, one large study found a statistically significant difference in favour of bathing with chlorhexidine (RR 0.36, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.79). The smaller studies found no difference between patients who washed with chlorhexidine and those who did not wash preoperatively. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review provides no clear evidence of benefit for preoperative showering or bathing with chlorhexidine over other wash products, to reduce surgical site infection. Efforts to reduce the incidence of nosocomial surgical site infection should focus on interventions where effect has been demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.