Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25927091›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis.

David K H Lo, Matthew N Hurley, Marianne S Muhlebach, Alan R Smyth

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04176328 (An Open-label, Dose-escalation Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled Teicoplanin in Cystic Fibrosis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04176328 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

An Open-label, Dose-escalation Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled Teicoplanin in Cystic Fibrosis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeupharma SrlRan2019 to 2020Enrolled12ConditionsCystic FibrosisArmsTeicoplanin Sandoz 200 mg powder and solvent for solution for injection or infusion or oral solution.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Polyclonality, Shared Strains, and Convergent Evolution in Chronic Cystic FibrosisAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The first report of Methicillin-resistantInternational journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cystic Fibrosis: Microbiology and Host Response.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2016
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Incidence and treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients: a cohort study.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David K H LoWard 12, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, UK, LE1 5WW.
Matthew N Hurley
Marianne S Muhlebach
Alan R Smyth
Queen's Medical Centre · GBLeicester Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCystic fibrosis is an inherited recessive disorder of chloride transport that is characterised by recurrent and persistent pulmonary infections from resistant organisms that result in lung function deterioration and early mortality in sufferers.Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as, not only an important infection in long-term hospitalised patients, but also as a potentially harmful pathogen in cystic fibrosis, and has been increasing steadily in prevalence internationally. Chronic pulmonary infection with MRSA is thought to confer cystic fibrosis patients with a worse overall clinical outcome and, in particular, result in an increased rate of decline in lung function. Clear guidance for the eradication of MRSA in cystic fibrosis, supported by robust evidence from good quality trials, is urgently needed.

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of treatment regimens designed to eradicate MRSA and to determine whether the eradication of MRSA confers better clinical and microbiological outcomes for people with cystic fibrosis. SEARCH

methodsRandomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, PUBMED, MEDLINE, Embase, handsearching article reference lists and through contact with local and international experts in the field.Date of the last search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 04 September 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing any combinations of topical, inhaled, oral or intravenous antimicrobials with the primary aim of eradicating MRSA compared with placebo, standard treatment or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The authors independently assessed all search results for eligibility. No eligible trials were identified for inclusion. MAIN

resultsNo current published eligible trials were identified, although three ongoing clinical trials are likely to be eligible for inclusion in future updates of this review. AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe did not identify any randomised trials which would allow us to make any evidence-based recommendations. Although the results of several non-randomised studies would suggest that, once isolated, the eradication of MRSA is possible; whether this has a significant impact on clinical outcome is still unclear. Further research is required to guide clinical decision making in the management of MRSA infection in cystic fibrosis.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusCystic FibrosisHumansStaphylococcal Infections

Identifiers

PMID25927091
OpenAlexW1952696275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.