ReviewJournal of radiology case reports2014
Inadvertent intravesicular placement of a vaginal contraceptive ring: a case report and review of literature.
Review in Journal of radiology case reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multimodality review of gynecologic devices in the pelvis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
- Intravesical misplacement of vaginal contraceptive ring: a video report and review of the literature.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The NuvaRing® is a deformable, ring-shaped hormonal contraceptive device which is typically vaginally self-inserted by the patient. While there are several potential side effects of usage, essentially all of them result from hormone delivery. Complications from incorrect placement are rare. We present the case of a 31 year old female who presented to our emergency department after being unable to retrieve a NuvaRing® for its scheduled removal. CT scan showed a hypodense intravesicular NuvaRing® which the patient had inadvertently placed transurethrally 3 weeks prior. Cystoscopy was performed and retrieval using a 3-pronged grasper was eventually successful after several failed attempts with an alligator grasper. Our purpose in presenting this case is to introduce the reader to a rare complication of incorrect NuvaRing® placement, explain how this complication may occur as a result of NuvaRing® construction/functionality, describe how alternative cystoscopic instruments may aid in cystoscopic retrieval, and review the 3 other case reports of intravesicular NuvaRing® placement to discuss the utility of various imaging modalities when clinical suspicion of the complication is high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.