Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25926759›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2015

Safety and tolerability of dienogest in endometriosis: pooled analysis from the European clinical study program.

Thomas Strowitzki, Thomas Faustmann, Christoph Gerlinger, Ulrike Schumacher, Christiane Ahlers, Christian Seitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Clinical Guidance Paper VVOG: Pharmacological treatment of endometriosis-related pain.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Article
  8. Hormonal Treatment of Endometriosis: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dienogest in endometriosis treatment: A narrative literature review.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Role of Dienogest in Endometriosis in Young Women.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas StrowitzkiDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas FaustmannBayer Pharma AG, Global Medical Affairs Women's Healthcare, Berlin, Germany.
Christoph GerlingerBayer Pharma AG, Global Research and Development Statistics, Berlin, Germany ; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical School of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Ulrike SchumacherJenapharm GmbH & Co KG, Medical Affairs Support, Jena, Germany ; Center for Clinical Studies, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Christiane AhlersBayer Pharma AG, Global Integrated Analysis and Lifecycle Management Statistics, Wuppertal, Germany.
Christian SeitzBayer Pharma AG, Global Clinical Development Therapeutic Area Primary Care and Women's Healthcare, Berlin, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn four randomized, controlled, European trials, dienogest 2 mg once daily demonstrated significant efficacy for lesion reduction and reduction in pain intensity in endometriosis. We describe a pooled analysis of the safety and tolerability data from these trials to confirm and further characterize the safety profile of dienogest in the treatment of endometriosis.

methodsAll 332 women treated with dienogest 2 mg who participated in the four clinical trials were included in the pooled analyses for safety assessments, including adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, body weight, and bleeding patterns. Safety variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

resultsPooled analyses of this large patient population confirmed that dienogest 2 mg is well tolerated, with a favorable safety profile extending over a period up to 65 weeks in women with endometriosis. The most common adverse drug reactions were headache, breast discomfort, depressed mood, and acne, each occurring in <10% of women. All these adverse events were generally of mild-to-moderate intensity and associated with low discontinuation rates. The bleeding pattern associated with dienogest 2 mg was well tolerated, and only two women (0.6%) reported bleeding events as the primary reason for premature discontinuation. Laboratory and vital sign assessments indicated no safety concerns for dienogest. Estradiol levels were maintained within the low-physiological range, in support of previous evidence indicating that dienogest 2 mg demonstrates therapeutic efficacy without inducing estradiol deficiency.

conclusionIn this pooled analysis of 332 women with endometriosis, dienogest was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile extending over a period of up to 65 weeks. There is a paucity of randomized trial evidence to support the use of many treatments in endometriosis. These pooled analyses from four clinical trials of dienogest 2 mg represent a contribution to evidence-based medicine in endometriosis, providing outcomes of potential relevance to daily practice.

Indexed as

clinical trialsendometriotic lesionsprogestinsside effectswomen

Identifiers

PMID25926759
PMCPMC4403681
OpenAlexW2079421112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.