Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25926546›Full record

ArticleGenome research2015

Using populations of human and microbial genomes for organism detection in metagenomes.

Sasha K Ames, Shea N Gardner, Jose Manuel Marti, Tom R Slezak, Maya B Gokhale, Jonathan E Allen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03229863 (The Infant MiND Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03229863 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Infant MiND Study: An Examination of Infants' Microbiome, Nutrition, and Development Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2017 to 2027Enrolled102ConditionsMicrobial Colonization, Infant DevelopmentArmsSweet Potatos, Pears
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. High-qualityMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sasha K AmesCenter for Applied Scientific Computing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA;
Shea N GardnerGlobal Security Computer Applications Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA;
Jose Manuel MartiInstituto de Física Corpuscular, CSIC-UVEG, E-46980 Valencia, Spain.
Tom R SlezakGlobal Security Computer Applications Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA;
Maya B GokhaleCenter for Applied Scientific Computing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA;
Jonathan E AllenGlobal Security Computer Applications Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying causative disease agents in human patients from shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS) presents a powerful tool to apply when other targeted diagnostics fail. Numerous technical challenges remain, however, before SMS can move beyond the role of research tool. Accurately separating the known and unknown organism content remains difficult, particularly when SMS is applied as a last resort. The true amount of human DNA that remains in a sample after screening against the human reference genome and filtering nonbiological components left from library preparation has previously been underreported. In this study, we create the most comprehensive collection of microbial and reference-free human genetic variation available in a database optimized for efficient metagenomic search by extracting sequences from GenBank and the 1000 Genomes Project. The results reveal new human sequences found in individual Human Microbiome Project (HMP) samples. Individual samples contain up to 95% human sequence, and 4% of the individual HMP samples contain 10% or more human reads. Left unidentified, human reads can complicate and slow down further analysis and lead to inaccurately labeled microbial taxa and ultimately lead to privacy concerns as more human genome data is collected.

Indexed as

Genome, MicrobialMetagenomeMicrobiotaComputational BiologyDatabases, Nucleic AcidHumansMetagenomicsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID25926546
PMCPMC4484388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.