Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25926461›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Spike synchrony reveals emergence of proto-objects in visual cortex.

Anne B Martin, Rüdiger von der Heydt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Brain-like border ownership signals support prediction of natural videos.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Grouping cells in primate visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Monosynaptic inference via finely-timed spikes.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Searching for object pointers in the visual cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Object Vision in a Structured World.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne B MartinDepartment of Neuroscience, the Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, and abmartin@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5454-4597
Rüdiger von der HeydtDepartment of Neuroscience, the Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, and The Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218.

Funding

NEURAL VISUAL CODING: IMAGE TO OBJECT REPRESENTATIONR01EY002966 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VON DER HEYDT, JOACHIM RUDIGER · 1985 to 2015
$6.4M
CRCNS-Attentional Selection and Perceptual OrganizationR01EY016281 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NIEBUR, ERNST · 2004 to 2012
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002966NEI NIH HHS R01-EY002966NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016281NEI NIH HHS R01EY016281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons at early stages of the visual cortex signal elemental features, such as pieces of contour, but how these signals are organized into perceptual objects is unclear. Theories have proposed that spiking synchrony between these neurons encodes how features are grouped (binding-by-synchrony), but recent studies did not find the predicted increase in synchrony with binding. Here we propose that features are grouped to "proto-objects" by intrinsic feedback circuits that enhance the responses of the participating feature neurons. This hypothesis predicts synchrony exclusively between feature neurons that receive feedback from the same grouping circuit. We recorded from neurons in macaque visual cortex and used border-ownership selectivity, an intrinsic property of the neurons, to infer whether or not two neurons are part of the same grouping circuit. We found that binding produced synchrony between same-circuit neurons, but not between other pairs of neurons, as predicted by the grouping hypothesis. In a selective attention task, synchrony emerged with ignored as well as attended objects, and higher synchrony was associated with faster behavioral responses, as would be expected from early grouping mechanisms that provide the structure for object-based processing. Thus, synchrony could be produced by automatic activation of intrinsic grouping circuits. However, the binding-related elevation of synchrony was weak compared with its random fluctuations, arguing against synchrony as a code for binding. In contrast, feedback grouping circuits encode binding by modulating the response strength of related feature neurons. Thus, our results suggest a novel coding mechanism that might underlie the proto-objects of perception.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAttentionEvoked Potentials, VisualEye MovementsFeedback, SensoryForm PerceptionMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsPhotic StimulationReaction TimeStatistics as TopicVisual CortexVisual Pathwaysarea V2attentionbindingfigure–ground organizationobjectsspike synchrony

Identifiers

PMID25926461
PMCPMC4412900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.