Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25926325›Full record

ArticleAoB PLANTS2015

DNA barcodes from four loci provide poor resolution of taxonomic groups in the genus Crataegus.

Mehdi Zarrei, Nadia Talent, Maria Kuzmina, Jeanette Lee, Jensen Lund, Paul R Shipley, Saša Stefanović, Timothy A Dickinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AoB PLANTS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Phylogeny ofPeerJ · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mehdi ZarreiThe Centre for Applied Genomics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, 686 Bay St, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 0A4.
Nadia TalentGreen Plant Herbarium, Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 2C6.
Maria KuzminaCanadian Centre for DNA Barcoding, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1.
Jeanette Lee109 Lakeshore Ave., Edgewood, BC, Canada V0G 1J0.
Jensen LundDepartment of Chemistry, I.K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7.
Paul R ShipleyDepartment of Chemistry, I.K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7.
Saša StefanovićDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3B2 Department of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON, Canada L5L 1C6.
Timothy A DickinsonGreen Plant Herbarium, Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 2C6 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3B2 tim.dickinson@utoronto.ca.
Okanagan University College · CARoyal Ontario Museum · CABarco (Belgium) · BESickKids Foundation · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA barcodes can facilitate identification of organisms especially when morphological characters are limited or unobservable. To what extent this potential is realized in specific groups of plants remains to be determined. Libraries of barcode sequences from well-studied authoritatively identified plants represented by herbarium voucher specimens are needed in order for DNA barcodes to serve their intended purpose, where this is possible, and to understand the reasons behind their failure to do so, when this occurs. We evaluated four loci, widely regarded as universal DNA barcodes for plants, for their utility in hawthorn species identification. Three plastid regions, matK, rbcLa and psbA-trnH, and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of nuclear ribosomal DNA discriminate only some of the species of Crataegus that can be recognized on the basis of their morphology etc. This is, in part, because in Rosaceae tribe Maleae most individual plastid loci yield relatively little taxonomic resolution and, in part, because the effects of allopolyploidization have not been eliminated by concerted evolution of the ITS regions. Although individual plastid markers provided generally poor resolution of taxonomic groups in Crataegus, a few species were notable exceptions. In contrast, analyses of concatenated sequences of the 3 plastid barcode loci plus 11 additional plastid loci gave a well-resolved maternal phylogeny. In the ITS2 tree, different individuals of some species formed groups with taxonomically unrelated species. This is a sign of lineage sorting due to incomplete concerted evolution in ITS2. Incongruence between the ITS2 and plastid trees is best explained by hybridization between different lineages within the genus. In aggregate, limited between-species variation in plastid loci, hybridization and a lack of concerted evolution in ITS2 all combine to limit the utility of standard barcoding markers in Crataegus. These results have implications for authentication of hawthorn materials in natural health products.

Indexed as

Gametophytic apomixishawthornhybridizationITS2Maleaenatural health productsplastid DNApolyploidyRosaceae

Identifiers

PMID25926325
PMCPMC4480070
OpenAlexW2109736145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.