ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2015
Catastrophic expenditure to pay for surgery worldwide: a modelling study.
Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
160 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cost-effectiveness of surgical interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and critical analysis of recent evidence.BMJ global health · 2024Pooled it
- Use of Telemedicine for Postdischarge Assessment of the Surgical Wound: International Cohort Study, and Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.Annals of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Global guidelines for emergency general surgery: systematic review and Delphi prioritization process.BJS open · 2022Pooled it
- Surgical site infection and costs in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the economic burden.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Non-operative versus operative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled study in Sierra Leone.BMC surgery · 2026Trial
- Accuracy of the Wound Healing Questionnaire in the diagnosis of surgical-site infection after abdominal surgery in low- and middle-income countries.The British journal of surgery · 2024Trial
- Adaptation of the Wound Healing Questionnaire universal-reporter outcome measure for use in global surgery trials (TALON-1 study): mixed-methods study and Rasch analysis.The British journal of surgery · 2023Trial
- Does community-based health insurance protect women from financial catastrophe after cesarean section? A prospective study from a rural hospital in Rwanda.BMC health services research · 2022Trial
- Reducing surgical site infections in low-income and middle-income countries (FALCON): a pragmatic, multicentre, stratified, randomised controlled trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2021Trial
- Strategies for High-Quality Spine Surgery in Resource-Limited Settings: The Five-P Framework for Equitable Surgical Delivery.Global spine journal · 2026Review
- Training Global Leaders in Perioperative Equity: An Evaluation of the CHESA Fellowship.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Association of surgery and economic development in low- and middle-income countries: evidence from a dynamic panel data analysis.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Patient-Proposed Solutions to Financial Toxicity After Surgery: A Longitudinal, Multicenter Qualitative Study.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Conventional versus enhanced recovery laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Rwanda: A comparative analysis of costs and clinical outcomes.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- Impact of fracture table availability and usability on surgical decision-making: a national cross-sectional survey of Nigerian orthopaedic surgeons.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Understanding barriers to pediatric hydrocephalus management: an international survey.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- One size does not fit all: income-sensitive thresholds for catastrophic health expenditure.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- The Landmark Series: Seminal Works in Global Cancer Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Perspectives of Community Health Physicians on Access to Neurosurgical Care in the Philippines.Cureus · 2026Article
- Between the scalpel and algorithms: how AI is redesigning Surgery.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2026Article
100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 150 million individuals worldwide face catastrophic expenditure each year from medical costs alone, and the non-medical costs of accessing care increase that number. The proportion of this expenditure related to surgery is unknown. Because the World Bank has proposed elimination of medical impoverishment by 2030, the effect of surgical conditions on financial catastrophe should be quantified so that any financial risk protection mechanisms can appropriately incorporate surgery.
methodsTo estimate the global incidence of catastrophic expenditure due to surgery, we built a stochastic model. The income distribution of each country, the probability of requiring surgery, and the medical and non-medical costs faced for surgery were incorporated. Sensitivity analyses were run to test the robustness of the model.
findings3·7 billion people (posterior credible interval 3·2-4·2 billion) risk catastrophic expenditure if they need surgery. Each year, 81·3 million people (80·8-81·7 million) worldwide are driven to financial catastrophe-32·8 million (32·4-33·1 million) from the costs of surgery alone and 48·5 million (47·7-49·3) from associated non-medical costs. The burden of catastrophic expenditure is highest in countries of low and middle income; within any country, it falls on the poor. Estimates were sensitive to the definition of catastrophic expenditure and the costs of care. The inequitable burden distribution was robust to model assumptions.
interpretationHalf the global population is at risk of financial catastrophe from surgery. Each year, surgical conditions cause 81 million individuals to face catastrophic expenditure, of which less than half is attributable to medical costs. These findings highlight the need for financial risk protection for surgery in health-system design.
fundingMGS received partial funding from NIH/NCI R25CA92203.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.