Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25926280›Full record

SynthesisUrolithiasis2015

The efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chunxiao Pu, Jia Wang, Yin Tang, Haichao Yuan, Jinhong Li, Yunjin Bai, Xiaoming Wang, Qiang Wei, Ping Han

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Urolithiasis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. GeneralF1000Research · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Thoracic Paravertebral Block versus Epidural Anesthesia Combined with Moderate Sedation for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Research progress of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.International urology and nephrology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chunxiao PuDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Jia WangDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yin TangDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Haichao YuanDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Jinhong LiDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yunjin BaiDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoming WangDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Qiang WeiDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Ping HanDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. hanpingwestchina@126.com.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under regional anesthesia (RA) vs. general anesthesia (GA). A systematic literature search in the electronic databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, Medline and EMBASE) was performed up to April 2014. Twelve trials, including 1954 patients, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Our pooled analysis showed that PCNL under RA could reduce surgical duration (MD, -2.47; 95 % CI, -3.51 to -1.44), hospitalization period (MD, -0.48; 95 % CI -0.93 to -0.04), fluoroscopy time (MD, -0.48; 95 % CI, -0.83 to -0.14), blood transfusion (OR, 0.59; 95 % CI, 0.38-0.92), postoperative pain (MD, -1.99; 95 % CI, -2.2 to -1.78), and analgesic requirements (MD, -19.14; 95 % CI, -26.64 to -11.63). However, there was no difference between RA and GA groups with regard to stone-free rate (OR, 1.09; 95 % CI, 0.86-1.37) and postoperative complications associated with PCNL (OR, 0.95; 95 % CI 0.58-1.54). Our results show that PCNL under RA offers several potential advantages over GA in terms of surgical duration, hospitalization period, fluoroscopy time, blood transfusion, postoperative pain, and analgesic requirements, but both anesthetic techniques appear to be equivalent with regard to the stone-free rate and complication rate. Along with the suggested favorable hemodynamic profile and lower cost, RA may prove a better alternative than GA.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, GeneralHumansLength of StayNephrostomy, PercutaneousOperative TimePain MeasurementPostoperative PainTreatment OutcomeUrinary CalculiAnalgesicsAnesthesiaEfficacyMeta-analysisPercutaneous nephrolithotomySafety

Identifiers

PMID25926280
OpenAlexW1973154845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.