ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2015
A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- From linear models to deep learning: statistical advances in genomic selection for animal breeding.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- A Deep Autoencoder Compression-Based Genomic Prediction Method for Whole-Genome Sequencing Data.Biology · 2025Article
- Efficient large-scale genomic prediction in approximate genome-based kernel model.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- GWABLUP: genome-wide association assisted best linear unbiased prediction of genetic values.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Genomic Predictions in Korean Hanwoo Cows: A Comparative Analysis of Genomic BLUP and Bayesian Methods for Reproductive Traits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- A dimensionality-reduction genomic prediction method without direct inverse of the genomic relationship matrix for large genomic data.Plant cell reports · 2023Article
- Article
- BayesR3 enables fast MCMC blocked processing for largescale multi-trait genomic prediction and QTN mapping analysis.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Article
- On the use of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction and fine-scale mapping of QTL.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Article
- Genome-Wide Prediction of Complex Traits in Two Outcrossing Plant Species Through Deep Learning and Bayesian Regularized Neural Network.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Improving Genomic Prediction of Crossbred and Purebred Dairy Cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Efficient Estimation of Marker Effects in Plant Breeding.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Article
- Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2017Article
- Multi-breed genomic prediction using Bayes R with sequence data and dropping variants with a small effect.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2017Article
- Simultaneous fitting of genomic-BLUP and Bayes-C components in a genomic prediction model.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2017Article
- Application of a Bayesian non-linear model hybrid scheme to sequence data for genomic prediction and QTL mapping.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- A fast algorithm for Bayesian multi-locus model in genome-wide association studies.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic prediction of breeding values from dense single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) genotypes is used for livestock and crop breeding, and can also be used to predict disease risk in humans. For some traits, the most accurate genomic predictions are achieved with non-linear estimates of SNP effects from Bayesian methods that treat SNP effects as random effects from a heavy tailed prior distribution. These Bayesian methods are usually implemented via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) schemes to sample from the posterior distribution of SNP effects, which is computationally expensive. Our aim was to develop an efficient expectation-maximisation algorithm (emBayesR) that gives similar estimates of SNP effects and accuracies of genomic prediction than the MCMC implementation of BayesR (a Bayesian method for genomic prediction), but with greatly reduced computation time.
methodsemBayesR is an approximate EM algorithm that retains the BayesR model assumption with SNP effects sampled from a mixture of normal distributions with increasing variance. emBayesR differs from other proposed non-MCMC implementations of Bayesian methods for genomic prediction in that it estimates the effect of each SNP while allowing for the error associated with estimation of all other SNP effects. emBayesR was compared to BayesR using simulated data, and real dairy cattle data with 632 003 SNPs genotyped, to determine if the MCMC and the expectation-maximisation approaches give similar accuracies of genomic prediction.
resultsWe were able to demonstrate that allowing for the error associated with estimation of other SNP effects when estimating the effect of each SNP in emBayesR improved the accuracy of genomic prediction over emBayesR without including this error correction, with both simulated and real data. When averaged over nine dairy traits, the accuracy of genomic prediction with emBayesR was only 0.5% lower than that from BayesR. However, emBayesR reduced computing time up to 8-fold compared to BayesR.
conclusionsThe emBayesR algorithm described here achieved similar accuracies of genomic prediction to BayesR for a range of simulated and real 630 K dairy SNP data. emBayesR needs less computing time than BayesR, which will allow it to be applied to larger datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.