ArticleExperimental brain research2015
Assessing the effects of tDCS over a delayed response inhibition task by targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on modulating executive functions in healthy populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- A behavioral and cognitive neuroscience perspective on impulsivity, suicide, and non-suicidal self-injury: Meta-analysis and recommendations for future research.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Brain Regions Identified Through Voxel-Based Morphometry on One-Legged Standing Balance With Eyes Closed.Brain and behavior · 2026Trial
- Enhancing response inhibition through a novel tES-fNIRS framework.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with cognitive training in adolescent boys with ADHD: a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial.Psychological medicine · 2023Trial
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Improves Cognitive Control in Patients With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Behavioral and Neurophysiological Study.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2021Trial
- Transcranial direct current stimulation and attention skills in burnout patients: a randomized blinded sham-controlled pilot study.F1000Research · 2020Trial
- Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Reduce Heavy Drinking: A Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2019Trial
- Got chocolate? Bilateral prefrontal cortex stimulation augments chocolate consumption.Appetite · 2018Trial
- A multi-method evaluation of trait and state-sensitive impulsivity in relation to impulsiveness of suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-injury in an adolescent clinical sample.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026Article
- Accelerated Anodal tDCS over Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus Improves Inhibitory Control Across Repeated Sessions: Evidence of a Cumulative After Effect.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Optimizing cognitive control through the interaction between stimulation intensity and duration in single-site and dual-site tDCS.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Craving and Relapse Rates in Opioid-Dependent Patients Undergoing Methadone Maintenance Therapy.Addiction & health · 2025Article
- Daily artificial gravity partially mitigates vestibular processing changes associated with head-down tilt bedrest.NPJ microgravity · 2024Article
- Alpha and Theta Oscillations Are Causally Linked to Interference Inhibition: Evidence from High-Definition Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Long-term effects of repeated multitarget high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training on response inhibition gains.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Impact of electrode selection on modeling tDCS in the aging brain.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Neurobiological regulation of eating behavior: Evidence based on non-invasive brain stimulation.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2022Review
- Multitarget high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation improves response inhibition more than single-target high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- No evidence of improvements in inhibitory control with tRNS.Neuroimage. Reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many situations in our everyday life call for a mechanism deputed to outright stop an ongoing course of action. This behavioral inhibition ability, known as response stopping, is often impaired in psychiatric conditions characterized by impulsivity and poor inhibitory control. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently been proposed as a tool for modulating response stopping in such clinical populations, and previous studies in healthy humans have already shown that this noninvasive brain stimulation technique is effectively able to improve response stopping, as measured in a stop-signal task (SST) administered immediately after the stimulation. So far, the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) has been the main focus of these attempts to modulate response stopping by the means of noninvasive brain stimulation. However, other cortical areas such as the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) have been implicated in inhibitory control with other paradigms. In order to provide new insight about the involvement of these areas in response stopping, in the present study, tDCS was delivered to 115 healthy subjects, using five stimulation setups that differed in terms of target area (rIFG or rDLPFC) and polarity of stimulation (anodal, cathodal, or sham). The SST was performed 15 min after the offset of the stimulation. Consistently with previous studies, only anodal stimulation over rIFG induced a reliable, although weak, improvement in the SST, which was specific for response stopping, as it was not mirrored in more general reaction time measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25925996What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.