ArticlePhytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology2015
Evaluation of pharmacodynamic activities of EPs® 7630, a special extract from roots of Pelargonium sidoides, in animals models of cough, secretolytic activity and acute bronchitis.
Article in Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of DW1601 in patients with acute bronchitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2022Trial
- Pelargonium sidoides root extract for the treatment of acute cough due to lower respiratory tract infection in adults: a feasibility double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Protective effects of Pelargonium sidoides against oxidative stress and inflammation in experimental mesenteric ischemia-reperfusion injury.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- Chemical Composition and Biological Activities ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prescription of EPs 7630 is associated with short- and long-term benefits in acute bronchitis: a real-world data analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Unlocking the therapeutic potential ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- Identifying in-market application of Pelargonium root extract EPs 7630 for the treatment of COVID-19: analysis of pharmacovigilance data.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Multiple mechanisms enable broad-spectrum activity of theFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Article
- Mechanistic Evidence ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- EPsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Effects of EPs 7630 on the duration of inability to work in acute bronchitis - a meta-analysis.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2023Article
- Safety ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Review
- Effects of Pelargonium sidoides extract EPs 7630 on acute cough and quality of life - a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2022Article
- Polyphenolic promiscuity, inflammation-coupled selectivity: Whether PAINs filters mask an antiviral asset.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Evaluation of botanicals as potential COVID-19 symptoms terminator.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Effects ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Article
- Combination of Pelargonium sidoides and Coptis chinensis root inhibits nuclear factor kappa B-mediated inflammatory response in vitro and in vivo.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEPs(®) 7630 is a proprietary aqueous-ethanolic extract from roots of Pelargonium sidoides DC and has been demonstrated to dispose among others of antibacterial, antiviral, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, and tissue-protective activity. It is an approved medicinal product in more than 50 countries for the treatment of airway infections such as acute bronchitis, common cold, and sinusitis. PURPOSE: While the pharmacological effects of EPs(®) 7630 have extensively been evaluated in diverse in vitro test systems, the number of publications reporting results from in vivo models is limited. STUDY
designIn the present study antitussive, secretolytic, and anti-inflammatory effects of EPs(®) 7630 were assessed in animal experiments following oral administration at human equivalent doses.
methodsAntitussive effects were evaluated using ammonia- and citric acid-induced models of cough in mice (20, 40, 120 mg/kg) and guinea pigs (10, 20, 45 mg/kg), respectively. For the determination of secretolytic activity tracheobronchial secretion of intraperitoneally injected phenol red was determined in mice, while antiinflammatory action was assessed in an acute bacterial bronchitis model in rats.
resultsA significant and dose-dependent reduction of cough frequency was observed in both cough models, which was accompanied by a prolongation of cough latency time. Similarly, the extract exerted a marked secretolytic activity in mice. Induction of acute bacterial bronchitis caused characteristic histopathological changes in lung tissue adjacent to trachea and bronchi. The degree of these lesions was significantly reduced in rats treated with EPs(®) 7630 at doses of 30 and 60 mg/kg. This protective effect at least partially seems to be mediated by an up-regulation of superoxide dismutase and a subsequent protective effect against oxidative stress as indicated by a reduced serum level of malondialdehyde.
conclusionThe present data further support the therapeutic use of EPs(®) 7630 in respiratory tract infections and provide a basis for detailed studies on its bioactive constituents as well as their in vivo mode of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.