ReviewNeurologia medico-chirurgica2015
Evaluation of Language Function under Awake Craniotomy.
Review in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Awake craniotomy and language assessment in deaf patients: a systematic review of feasibility, communication strategies, and outcomes.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- The feasibility and added value of mapping music during awake craniotomy: A systematic review.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- A movie in the operating theater: Guided story narration as a pragmatic language screening tool during awake craniotomy.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Intraoperative Brain Mapping in Multilingual Patients: What Do We Know and Where Are We Going?Brain sciences · 2022Review
- The Use of Standardized Intraoperative Language Tests in Awake Craniotomies: A Scoping Review.Neuropsychology review · 2022Article
- Intraoperative hand strength as an indicator of consciousness during awake craniotomy: a prospective, observational study.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- Article
- Preoperative Prediction of Communication Difficulties during Awake Craniotomy in Glioma Patients: A Retrospective Evaluation of 136 Cases at a Single Institution.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2021Article
- The Efficacy of Intraoperative Passive Language Mapping for Glioma Surgery: A Case Report.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Psychogenic Pseudo-responses in an Electrical Cortical Stimulation.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2019Article
- Role of Clinical Neuropsychologists in Awake-Craniotomy.Neurology IndiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Awake craniotomy is the only established way to assess patients' language functions intraoperatively and to contribute to their preservation, if necessary. Recent guidelines have enabled the approach to be used widely, effectively, and safely. Non-invasive brain functional imaging techniques, including functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging, have been used preoperatively to identify brain functional regions corresponding to language, and their accuracy has increased year by year. In addition, the use of neuronavigation that incorporates this preoperative information has made it possible to identify the positional relationships between the lesion and functional regions involved in language, conduct functional brain mapping in the awake state with electrical stimulation, and intraoperatively assess nerve function in real time when resecting the lesion. This article outlines the history of awake craniotomy, the current state of pre- and intraoperative evaluation of language function, and the clinical usefulness of such functional evaluation. When evaluating patients' language functions during awake craniotomy, given the various intraoperative stresses involved, it is necessary to carefully select the tasks to be undertaken, quickly perform all examinations, and promptly evaluate the results. As language functions involve both input and output, they are strongly affected by patients' preoperative cognitive function, degree of intraoperative wakefulness and fatigue, the ability to produce verbal articulations and utterances, as well as perform synergic movement. Therefore, it is essential to appropriately assess the reproducibility of language function evaluation using awake craniotomy techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.