Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25925433›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2015

Current techniques for high-resolution mapping of behavioral circuits in Drosophila.

Lovesha Sivanantharajah, Bing Zhang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Innate and Conditioned Taste Processing inCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2023
    Article
  2. The Use ofBiomedicines · 2022
    Review
  3. Insights from intoxicated Drosophila.Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neural plasticity · 2017
    Review
  7. Pavlovian Conditioning of LarvalFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lovesha SivanantharajahDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65221, USA.
Bing Zhang

Funding

Genetics and Cell Biology of Synaptic Development and FunctionR01NS060878 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI ZHANG, BING · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060878NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS060878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding behavior requires unraveling the mysteries of neurons, glia, and their extensive connectivity. Drosophila has emerged as an excellent organism for studying the neural basis of behavior. This can be largely attributed to the extensive effort of the fly community to develop numerous sophisticated genetic tools for visualizing, mapping, and manipulating behavioral circuits. Here, we attempt to highlight some of the new reagents, techniques and approaches available for dissecting behavioral circuits in Drosophila. We focus on detailing intersectional strategies such as the Flippase-induced intersectional Gal80/Gal4 repression (FINGR), because of the tremendous potential they possess for mapping the minimal number of cells required for a particular behavior. The logic and strategies outlined in this review should have broad applications for other genetic model organisms.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrosophilaNeural Pathways

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.