Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25925393›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2015

New Targets for Prevention of Schizophrenia: Is It Time for Interventions in the Premorbid Phase?

Larry J Seidman, Merete Nordentoft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Continuum beliefs of mental illness: a systematic review of measures.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Improving outcomes of first-episode psychosis: an overview.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Larry J SeidmanMassachusetts Mental Health Center Public Psychiatry Division of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; lseidman@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Merete NordentoftInstitute for Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Mental Health Center of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Brain Function and Structure in Young Children at Familial Risk for SchizophreniaR21MH092840 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GABRIELI, JOHN, KESHAVAN, MATCHERI S. · 2012 to 2013
$482k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH092840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of influences have converged that make this Special Theme Issue timely: "A New Direction: Considering Developmentally Sensitive Targets for Very Early Intervention in Schizophrenia". These factors include: 1. the substantial knowledge about premorbid developmental vulnerabilities to psychosis, especially regarding schizophrenia; 2. the promising results emerging from interventions during the clinical high-risk (CHR) phase of psychosis and; 3. the recognition that the CHR period is a relatively late phase of developmental derailment. These factors have together led to a perspective that even earlier intervention is warranted. This paper briefly summarizes the articles comprising the Special Theme including new data on early neurocognitive development, proposed potential targets for psychosocial and psychopharmacological interventions during the premorbid period as early as pregnancy, and ethical challenges. These thought experiments must be empirically tested, and the ethical challenges overcome as posed by the various interventions, which range from relatively low risk, supportive, psychosocial to higher risk, experimental, pharmacological interventions. All of the interventions proposed require careful study of ethics, safety, potential stigma, feasibility, efficacy and tolerability, and the meaning to the people involved.

Indexed as

Early Medical InterventionProdromal SymptomsHumansPsychotic DisordersRiskSchizophreniaclinical high riskcritical periodearly interventionendophenotypefamily high riskperinatalpremorbidprenatalprimary preventionprodrome

Identifiers

PMID25925393
PMCPMC4466192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.