Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25925357›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2015

Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: diagnostic accuracy of CT.

Paul Kauv, Samir Benadjaoud, Emmanuel Curis, Isabelle Boulay-Coletta, Jerome Loriau, Marc Zins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The importance of rectal contrast in CT assessment to detect anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
  15. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
  16. Computed tomography in suspected anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: evaluating mortality rates after false-negative imaging.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Elucidating vaginal fistulas on CT and MRI.Insights into imaging · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paul KauvDepartment of Radiology, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
Samir BenadjaoudDepartment of Radiology, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
Emmanuel CurisLaboratoire de biomathématiques, Faculté de pharmacie, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, 75006, Paris, France.
Isabelle Boulay-ColettaDepartment of Radiology, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
Jerome LoriauDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
Marc ZinsDepartment of Radiology, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France. mzins@hpsj.fr.
Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph · FRHôpital Saint Joseph · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT in postoperative colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL).

methodsTwo independent blinded radiologists reviewed 153 CTs performed for suspected AL within 60 days after surgery in 131 consecutive patients, with (n = 58) or without (n = 95) retrograde contrast enema (RCE). Results were compared to original interpretations. The reference standard was reoperation or consensus (a radiologist and a surgeon) regarding clinical, laboratory, radiological, and follow-up data after medical treatment.

resultsAL was confirmed in 34/131 patients. For the two reviewers and original interpretation, sensitivity of CT was 82 %, 87 %, and 71 %, respectively; specificity was 84 %, 84 %, and 92 %. RCE significantly increased the positive predictive value (from 40 % to 88 %, P = 0.0009; 41 % to 92 %, P = 0.0016; and 40 % to 100 %, P = 0.0006). Contrast extravasation was the most sensitive (reviewers, 83 % and 83 %) and specific (97 % and 97 %) sign and was significantly associated with AL by univariate analysis (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis with recursive partitioning, CT with RCE was accurate to confirm or rule out AL with contrast extravasation.

conclusionsCT with RCE is accurate for diagnosing postoperative colorectal AL. Contrast extravasation is the most reliable sign. RCE should be performed during CT for suspected AL. KEY POINTS: • CT accurately diagnosed clinically suspected colorectal AL and showed good interobserver agreement • Contrast extravasation was the most sensitive and specific CT sign • Retrograde contrast enema during CT improved positive predictive value • Retrograde contrast enema decreased false-negative or indeterminate original CT interpretations.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomotic LeakColorectal SurgeryContrast MediaDiatrizoate MeglumineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPostoperative PeriodRadiographic Image EnhancementReoperationContrast MediaDiatrizoate MeglumineioversolTriiodobenzoic AcidsAnastomotic LeakColorectal SurgeryComputed TomographyEnemaExtravasation of Contrast Media

Identifiers

PMID25925357
OpenAlexW2052551739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.