SynthesisDer Orthopade2015
[Personality and comorbidity: are there "difficult patients" in hip arthroplasty?].
Synthesis in Der Orthopade, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of IL-17A and Combined Mechanical Injury on Meniscal Tissue Integrity In Vitro.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of Stem Design and Positioning on the Leg Axis after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Secondary Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Institutional Surgical Setting and Volume Effects of Certified Arthroplasty Centers in Germany: Evaluation of the Quality of Care in a 5-Year Comparison.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effects of the Practice of Movement Representation Techniques in People Undergoing Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Total Hip Replacement for Osteoarthritis-Evidence-Based and Patient-Oriented Indications.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConcomitant disorders at the time of surgery in addition to psychological and socioeconomic patient characteristics may influence treatment outcomes in hip arthroplasty.
objectivesTo describe the impact of these factors on perioperative complications and postoperative results in terms of function, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND
methodsReview of relevant clinical studies, meta-analyses, and presentation of our own results.
resultsComorbidities in general, especially in combination, increase the perioperative risk profile. Socioeconomic factors (education, professional qualifications, social deprivation) in addition to psychological variables (depression, distressed personality) can have a major impact on postoperative functional outcomes and patient satisfaction.
conclusionsIt is of crucial importance to avoid inequalities in the provision of joint replacement for patients with hip osteoarthritis and co-existing risk factors. Preventive strategies should be implemented to reduce the negative impact of comorbidities on treatment outcome. Personalized communication and education may be helpful in avoiding unrealistic patient expectations before hip replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.