Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25925042›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2015

Functional outcome of prolonged refractory status epilepticus.

Alexandre Lai, Hervé D Outin, Julien Jabot, Bruno Mégarbane, Stéphane Gaudry, Rémi Coudroy, Guillaume Louis, Francis Schneider, Nicolas Barbarot, Antoine Roch and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Termination of super-refractory status epilepticus following stereo-EEG implantation.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Electroconvulsive Therapy in Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: Case Series with a Defined Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Treatment of Refractory and Super-refractory Status Epilepticus.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Alexandre LaiService de Réanimation médicale, Hôpital Central, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France. lai.alexandre93@gmail.com.
Hervé D OutinService de Réanimation médico-chirurgicale, CHI de Poissy-Saint Germain en Laye, Poissy, France. outin@chi-poissy-st-germain.fr.
Julien JabotService de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHU Réunion, Saint Denis de la Réunion, France. jabot974@gmail.com.
Bruno MégarbaneService de Réanimation et de Toxicologie, CHU Lariboisière, Université Paris VI, Paris, France. bruno.megarbane@lrb.ap-hop-paris.fr.
Stéphane GaudryService de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France. stephanegaudry@gmail.com.
Rémi CoudroyService de Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France. r.coudroy@yahoo.fr.
Guillaume LouisService de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHR de Metz-Thionville, Metz, France. gus_louis@yahoo.fr.
Francis SchneiderService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de Strasbourg-Hautepierre, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France. francis.schneider@chru-strasbourg.fr.
Nicolas BarbarotService de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH de St Brieuc, St Brieuc, France. nicolas.barbarot@ch-stbrieuc.fr.
Antoine RochService de Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Marseille, Marseille, France. antoine.roch@mail.ap-hm.fr.
Nicolas LerolleService de Réanimation Médicale et de Médecine Hyperbare, CHU et Université d'Angers, Angers, France. nicolas.lerolle@univ-angers.fr.
David LuisService de Réanimation Médico-chirurgicale, Garches, France. davidluis.fr@gmail.com.
François FourrierService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHU de Lille, Lille, France. ffourrier@nordnet.fr.
Anne RenaultService de Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Brest, Brest, France. anne.renault@chu-brest.fr.
Laurent ArgaudService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France. laurent.argaud@chu-lyon.fr.
Tarek SharsharService de Réanimation Médico-chirurgicale, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches and Université de Versailles St Quentin en Yvelines, Garches, France. tarek.sharshar@rpc.aphp.fr.
Sébastien GibotService de Réanimation médicale, Hôpital Central, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France. s.gibot@chu-nancy.fr.
Pierre-Edouard BollaertService de Réanimation médicale, Hôpital Central, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France. pe.bollaert@chu-nancy.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo characterize etiology, clinical course and outcomes of patients in prolonged refractory status epilepticus (PRSE) and looking for prognostic factors.

methodsRetrospective study conducted in patients hospitalized from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2011 in 19 polyvalent intensive care units in French university and general hospitals. Patients were adults with a generalized convulsive refractory status epilepticus that lasted more than seven days, despite treatment including an anesthetic drug and mechanical ventilation. Patients with anoxic encephalopathy were excluded. Follow-up phone call was used to determine functional outcome using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) with mRS 0-3 defining good and mRS 4-6 poor outcome.

results78 patients (35 female) were included. Median age was 57 years. Causes of status epilepticus were various, mainly including prior epilepsy (14.1%), CNS infection (12.8%), and stroke (12.8%). No etiology was found in 27 (34.6%) patients. PRSE was considered controlled in only 53 (67.9%) patients after a median duration of 17 (IQR 12-26) days. The median length of ICU stay was 28 (19-48) days. Forty-one (52.5%) patients died in the ICU, 26 from multiple organ failure, 8 from care withdrawal, 2 from sudden cardiac arrest, 1 from brain death and 4 from unknown causes. PRSE was previously resolved in 20 patients who died in the ICU. At one-year follow-up, there were 12 patients with good outcome and 58 with poor outcome and 8 lost of follow-up. On multivariate analysis, only vasopressor use was a predictor of poor outcome (OR 6.54; 95%CI 1.09-39.29; p = 0.04).

conclusionPoor outcome was observed in about 80% of this population of PRSE. Most patients died from systemic complications linked to their ICU stay. Some patients can recover satisfactorily over time though we did not identify any robust factor of good outcome.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityRetrospective StudiesStatus EpilepticusTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25925042
PMCPMC4426536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.