Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25924851›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2015

Rethinking agency and medical adherence technology: applying Actor Network Theory to the case study of Digital Pills.

Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza, Mark L Cabling, Vanessa B Sheppard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alejandra Hurtado-de-MendozaGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Mark L CablingGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Vanessa B SheppardGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

PREDICTORS OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY ADHERENCE IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCERR01CA154848 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SHEPPARD, VANESSA B · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154848NCI NIH HHS R01CA154848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much literature surrounding medical technology and adherence posits that technology is a mechanism for social control. This assumes that the medical establishment can take away patients' agency. Although power relationships and social control can play a key role, medical technology can also serve as an agentive tool to be utilized. We (1) offer the alternative framework of Actor Network Theory to view medical technology, (2) discuss the literature on medication adherence and technology, (3) delve into the ramifications of looking at adherence as a network and (4) use Digital Pills as a case study of dispersed agency.

Indexed as

Decision TheoryMedical Informatics ApplicationsMedication AdherenceChronic DiseaseDiffusion of InnovationHumansActor Network TheoryagencyDigital Pillsmedical adherencemedical technology

Identifiers

PMID25924851
PMCPMC10265502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.