Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25924702›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2015

Prognostic value of CD56 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis.

Shuangnian Xu, Xi Li, Jianmin Zhang, Jieping Chen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CD56 on immune and tumor cells: what is known and beyond?Clinical and experimental immunology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. HEMOPHAGOCYTOSIS BY BLASTS IN A CHILD WITH ACUTE MONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Bone marrow fibrosis at diagnosis predicts survival for primary acute myeloid leukemia.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuangnian XuCenter for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xi Li
Jianmin Zhang
Jieping Chen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExtensive studies have investigated the prognostic value of CD56 for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but the results remained inconclusive. The aim of this meta-analysis is to resolve this controversial issue.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CBM was performed to identify studies that assessed the prognostic value of CD56 in AML patients. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95 % CIs for complete remission rate (CRR) and relapse rate (RR) were calculated.

resultsTotally, 32 studies with 4074 patients were included. For AML with t(8;21) translocation, CD56 overexpression was associated with shorter OS (HR 2.22; 95 % CI 1.30-3.78) and DFS (HR 2.63; 95 % CI 1.10-6.29) and increased RR (OR 3.29; 95 % CI 1.67-6.48), but did not affect CRR (OR 0.94; 95 % CI 0.49-1.80). For AML with t(15;17) translocation, CD56 overexpression was associated with shorter OS (HR 2.43; 95 % CI 1.66-3.57) and DFS (HR 4.27; 95 % CI 1.15-15.78), increased RR (OR 3.11; 95 % CI 2.01-4.81), and decreased CRR (OR 0.42; 95 % CI 0.25-0.72). For AML as a whole, CD56 overexpression was associated with shorter OS (HR 1.74; 95 % CI 1.38-2.19) and DFS (HR 2.38; 95 % CI 1.87-3.02), increased RR (OR 5.19; 95 % CI 2.84-9.48), and decreased CRR (OR 0.62; 95 % CI 0.41-0.96).

conclusionsThis meta-analysis indicated that CD56 overexpression may be an adverse prognostic factor for AML.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCD56 AntigenChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansInfantLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRemission InductionCD56 AntigenNCAM1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25924702
PMCPMC11823892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.