Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25924683›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2015

Antipsychotic drug exposure and risk of pulmonary embolism: a population-based, nested case-control study.

Valentino Conti, Mauro Venegoni, Alfredo Cocci, Ida Fortino, Antonio Lora, Corrado Barbui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Two pulmonary emboli in a psych pod.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Article
  6. Impact of drugs on venous thromboembolism risk in surgical patients.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antipsychotic drug exposure and risk of myocardial infarction.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Big data for bipolar disorder.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valentino ContiRegional Centre for Pharmacovigilance, Lombardy Region, Milano, Italy. valentino.conti@gmail.com.
Mauro VenegoniRegional Centre for Pharmacovigilance, Lombardy Region, Milano, Italy. mauro_venegoni@regione.lombardia.it.
Alfredo CocciRegional Centre for Pharmacovigilance, Lombardy Region, Milano, Italy. alfredo_cocci@regione.lombardia.it.
Ida FortinoUnit of Community Health Services, Regional Health Ministry, Lombardy Region, Milan, Italy. ida_fortino@regione.lombardia.it.
Antonio LoraDepartment of Mental Health, Lecco, Italy. a.lora@ospedale.lecco.it.
Corrado BarbuiWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. corrado.barbui@univr.it.
Regione LombardiaMinistero della Salute · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnly three observational studies investigated whether exposure to antipsychotics is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism, with conflicting results. This study was therefore carried out to establish the risk of pulmonary embolism associated with antipsychotic drugs, and to ascertain the risk associated with first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs, and with exposure to individual drugs.

methodsWe identified 84,253 adult individuals who began antipsychotic treatment in a large Italian health care system. Cases were all cohort members who were hospitalized for non-fatal or fatal pulmonary embolism during follow-up. Up to 20 controls for each case were extracted from the study cohort using incidence density sampling and matched by age at cohort entry and gender. Each individual was classified as current, recent or past antipsychotic user. The occurrence non-fatal or fatal pulmonary embolism was the outcome of interest.

resultsCompared to past use, current antipsychotic use more than double the risk of pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 2.31, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 4.59), while recent use did not increase the risk. Both conventional and atypical antipsychotic exposure was associated with an increase in risk, and the concomitant use of both classes increased the risk of four times (odds ratio 4.21, 95% confidence interval 1.53 to 11.59).

conclusionsAdding the results of this case-control study to a recent meta-analysis of three observational studies substantially changed the overall estimate, which now indicates that antipsychotic exposure significantly increases the risk of pulmonary embolism.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntipsychotic AgentsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceItalyMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary EmbolismRisk FactorsYoung AdultAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25924683
PMCPMC4423096
OpenAlexW2050883076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.