Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25924630›Full record

ArticleOpen biology2015

Nonlinear ionizing radiation-induced changes in eye lens cell proliferation, cyclin D1 expression and lens shape.

Ewa Markiewicz, Stephen Barnard, Jackie Haines, Margaret Coster, Orry van Geel, Weiju Wu, Shane Richards, Elizabeth Ainsbury, Kai Rothkamm, Simon Bouffler and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ewa MarkiewiczSchool of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.
Stephen BarnardPublic Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical & Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK.
Jackie HainesPublic Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical & Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK.
Margaret CosterPublic Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical & Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK.
Orry van GeelSchool of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK Faculty of Science, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 11, Leuven 3001, Belgium.
Weiju WuSchool of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK Biophysical Sciences Institute, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.
Shane RichardsSchool of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.
Elizabeth AinsburyPublic Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical & Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK.
Kai RothkammPublic Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical & Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK.
Simon BoufflerPublic Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical & Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK.
Roy A QuinlanSchool of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK Biophysical Sciences Institute, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK r.a.quinlan@dur.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-4123
Public Health England · GBDurham University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated cataract risk after radiation exposure was established soon after the discovery of X-rays in 1895. Today, increased cataract incidence among medical imaging practitioners and after nuclear incidents has highlighted how little is still understood about the biological responses of the lens to low-dose ionizing radiation (IR). Here, we show for the first time that in mice, lens epithelial cells (LECs) in the peripheral region repair DNA double strand breaks (DSB) after exposure to 20 and 100 mGy more slowly compared with circulating blood lymphocytes, as demonstrated by counts of γH2AX foci in cell nuclei. LECs in the central region repaired DSBs faster than either LECs in the lens periphery or lymphocytes. Although DSB markers (γH2AX, 53BP1 and RAD51) in both lens regions showed linear dose responses at the 1 h timepoint, nonlinear responses were observed in lenses for EdU (5-ethynyl-2'-deoxy-uridine) incorporation, cyclin D1 staining and cell density after 24 h at 100 and 250 mGy. After 10 months, the lens aspect ratio was also altered, an indicator of the consequences of the altered cell proliferation and cell density changes. A best-fit model demonstrated a dose-response peak at 500 mGy. These data identify specific nonlinear biological responses to low (less than 1000 mGy) dose IR-induced DNA damage in the lens epithelium.

Indexed as

X-RaysAlgorithmsAnimalsCell LineCell ProliferationCell ShapeCyclin D1DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairDose-Response Relationship, RadiationEpithelial CellsFemaleHistonesHumansImmunoblottingLens, CrystallineCyclin D1gamma-H2AX protein, mouseHistonescyclin D1DNA DSBeye lensionizing radiationnon-linear effectγH2AX

Identifiers

PMID25924630
PMCPMC4422125
OpenAlexW2042218859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.