Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25924009›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Cost-Effectiveness of Screening and Treating Foreign-Born Students for Tuberculosis before Entering the United States.

La'Marcus T Wingate, Margaret S Coleman, Drew L Posey, Weigong Zhou, Christine K Olson, Brian Maskery, Martin S Cetron, John A Painter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Screening strategies for active tuberculosis: focus on cost-effectiveness.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

La'Marcus T WingateDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Margaret S ColemanDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Drew L PoseyDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Weigong ZhouDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Christine K OlsonDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Brian MaskeryDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Martin S CetronDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
John A PainterDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is considering implementation of overseas medical screening of student-visa applicants to reduce the numbers of active tuberculosis cases entering the United States.

objectiveTo evaluate the costs, cases averted, and cost-effectiveness of screening for, and treating, tuberculosis in United States-bound students from countries with varying tuberculosis prevalence.

methodsCosts and benefits were evaluated from two perspectives, combined and United States only. The combined perspective totaled overseas and United States costs and benefits from a societal perspective. The United States only perspective was a domestic measure of costs and benefits. A decision tree was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis screening and treatment from the combined perspective.

resultsFrom the United States only perspective, overseas screening programs of Chinese and Indian students would prevent the importation of 157 tuberculosis cases annually, and result in $2.7 million in savings. From the combined perspective, screening programs for Chinese students would cost more than $2.8 million annually and screening programs for Indian students nearly $440,000 annually. From the combined perspective, the incremental cost for each tuberculosis case averted by screening Chinese and Indian students was $22,187 and $15,063, respectively. Implementing screening programs for German students would prevent no cases in most years, and would result in increased costs both overseas and in the United States. The domestic costs would occur because public health departments would need to follow up on students identified overseas as having an elevated risk of tuberculosis.

conclusionsTuberculosis screening and treatment programs for students seeking long term visas to attend United States schools would reduce the number of tuberculosis cases imported. Implementing screening in high-incidence countries could save the United States millions of dollars annually; however there would be increased costs incurred overseas for students and their families.

Indexed as

StudentsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Cost-Benefit AnalysisEmigrants and ImmigrantsHumansInternationalityRefugeesTuberculosisUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25924009
PMCPMC4414530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.