Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25923725›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Discerning pig screams in production environments.

J Vandermeulen, C Bahr, E Tullo, I Fontana, S Ott, M Kashiha, M Guarino, C P H Moons, F A M Tuyttens, T A Niewold and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Eliciting and Characterizing Porcine Vocalizations: When Pigs Fly.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

J VandermeulenM3-BIORES-Measure, Model & Manage Bioresponses, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
C BahrM3-BIORES-Measure, Model & Manage Bioresponses, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
E TulloDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
I FontanaDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
S OttLivestock-Nutrition-Quality, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Departement of Animal Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Laboratory for Ethology, Ghent university, Merelbeke, Belgium.
M KashihaM3-BIORES-Measure, Model & Manage Bioresponses, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
M GuarinoDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
C P H MoonsDepartement of Animal Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Laboratory for Ethology, Ghent university, Merelbeke, Belgium.
F A M TuyttensDepartement of Animal Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Laboratory for Ethology, Ghent university, Merelbeke, Belgium; Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Melle, Belgium.
T A NiewoldLivestock-Nutrition-Quality, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
D BerckmansM3-BIORES-Measure, Model & Manage Bioresponses, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pig vocalisations convey information about their current state of health and welfare. Continuously monitoring these vocalisations can provide useful information for the farmer. For instance, pig screams can indicate stressful situations. When monitoring screams, other sounds can interfere with scream detection. Therefore, identifying screams from other sounds is essential. The objective of this study was to understand which sound features define a scream. Therefore, a method to detect screams based on sound features with physical meaning and explicit rules was developed. To achieve this, 7 hours of labelled data from 24 pigs was used. The developed detection method attained 72% sensitivity, 91% specificity and 83% precision. As a result, the detection method showed that screams contain the following features discerning them from other sounds: a formant structure, adequate power, high frequency content, sufficient variability and duration.

Indexed as

AnimalsArea Under CurveROC CurveStress, PhysiologicalSwineTape RecordingVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID25923725
PMCPMC4414550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.