Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25923592›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2015

Why is aging conserved and what can we do about it?

Jason N Pitt, Matt Kaeberlein

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ReducedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Combinatorial Approach UsingMolecules and cells · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jason N PittDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Matt KaeberleinDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

SPECIFICITY OF OXYGEN DNA DAMAGE AND MUTAGENESISP01AG001751 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RABINOVITCH, PETER S · 1985 to 2021
$29.6M
GENETIC APPROACHES TO AGING RESEARCHT32AG000057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RABINOVITCH, PETER S · 1985 to 2019
$14.2M
Mechanism of lifespan and healthspan regulation by the hypoxic response transcripR01AG038518 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KAEBERLEIN, MATT · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS AG038518NIA NIH HHS P01 AG001751NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038518NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000057NIA NIH HHS T32AG000057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of aging research has progressed rapidly over the past few decades. Genetic modulators of aging rate that are conserved over a broad evolutionary distance have now been identified. Several physiological and environmental interventions have also been shown to influence the rate of aging in organisms ranging from yeast to mammals. Here we briefly review these conserved pathways and interventions and highlight some key unsolved challenges that remain. Although the molecular mechanisms by which these modifiers of aging act are only partially understood, interventions to slow aging are nearing clinical application, and it is likely that we will begin to reap the benefits of aging research prior to solving all of the mysteries that the biology of aging has to offer.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsHumansResearch

Identifiers

PMID25923592
PMCPMC4414409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.