Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25923466›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Impact of Toceranib/Piroxicam/Cyclophosphamide Maintenance Therapy on Outcome of Dogs with Appendicular Osteosarcoma following Amputation and Carboplatin Chemotherapy: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Cheryl A London, Heather L Gardner, Tamra Mathie, Nicole Stingle, Roberta Portela, Michael L Pennell, Craig A Clifford, Mona P Rosenberg, David M Vail, Laurel E Williams and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Combined radiation andMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Repurposing Drugs in Small Animal Oncology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recent and current clinical trials in canine appendicular osteosarcoma.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Cheryl A LondonDepartments of Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Heather L GardnerDepartments of Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Tamra MathieDepartments of Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Nicole StingleDepartments of Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Roberta PortelaDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Veterinary Medicine, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.
Michael L PennellDivision of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Craig A CliffordHope Veterinary Specialists, Malvern, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Mona P RosenbergVeterinary Cancer Group, Tustin, California, United States of America.
David M VailDepartment of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Laurel E WilliamsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Kim L CroninNew England Veterinary Oncology Group, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Heather Wilson-RoblesDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Antonella BorgattiDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Carolyn J HenryDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Dennis B BaileyOradell Animal Hospital, Paramus, New Jersey, United States of America.
Jennifer LockeSoutheast Veterinary Oncology and Medicine, Orange Park, Florida, United States of America.
Nicole C NorthrupDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Martin Crawford-JakubiakSage Centers for Veterinary Specialty and Emergency Care, Concord, California, United States of America.
Virginia L GillVCA Katonah Bedford Veterinary Center, Bedford Hill, New York, United States of America.
Mary K KleinSouthwest Veterinary Oncology, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
David M RuslanderVeterinary Specialty Hospital of the Carolinas, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.
Doug H ThammDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Brenda PhillipsVeterinary Specialty Hospital of San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Gerald PostThe Veterinary Cancer Center, Norwalk, Connecticut, United States of America.
The Ohio State University · USCarolina Veterinary Specialists · USArchaeology Southwest · USBedford VA Research Corporation · USChildren's Oncology Group · USColorado State University · USNorth Carolina State University · USOrthopedic Specialty Hospital · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science Program (TL1)UL1RR025755 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2008 to 2011
$26.3M
The Ohio State University Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001070 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2013 to 2017
$22.6M
The Ohio State University Center for Clinical and Translational Science (UL1)UL1TR000090 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2012 to 2013
$7.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000090NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001070NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe hypothesized that the addition of toceranib to metronomic cyclophosphamide/piroxicam therapy would significantly improve disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS) in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma (OSA) following amputation and carboplatin chemotherapy. METHODS AND

findingsThis was a randomized, prospective clinical trial in which dogs with OSA free of gross metastatic disease (n = 126) received carboplatin chemotherapy (4 doses) following amputation. On study entry, dogs were randomized to receive piroxicam/cyclophosphamide with or without toceranib (n = 63 each) after completing chemotherapy. Patient demographics were not significantly different between both groups. During or immediately following carboplatin chemotherapy, 32 dogs (n = 13 toceranib; n = 19 control) developed metastatic disease, and 13 dogs left the study due to other medical conditions or owner preference. Following carboplatin chemotherapy, 81 dogs (n = 46 toceranib; n = 35 control) received the metronomic treatment; 35 dogs (n = 20 toceranib; n = 15 control) developed metastatic disease during the maintenance therapy, and 26 dogs left the study due to other medical conditions or owner preference. Nine toceranib-treated and 11 control dogs completed the study without evidence of metastatic disease 1-year following amputation. Toceranib-treated dogs experienced more episodes of diarrhea, neutropenia and weight loss than control dogs, although these toxicities were low-grade and typically resolved with supportive care. More toceranib-treated dogs (n = 8) were removed from the study for therapy-associated adverse events compared to control dogs (n = 1). The median DFI for control and toceranib treated dogs was 215 and 233 days, respectively (p = 0.274); the median OS for control and toceranib treated dogs was 242 and 318 days, respectively (p = 0.08). The one year survival rate for control dogs was 35% compared to 38% for dogs receiving toceranib.

conclusionsThe addition of toceranib to metronomic piroxicam/cyclophosphamide therapy following amputation and carboplatin chemotherapy did not improve median DFI, OS or the 1-year survival rate in dogs with OSA.

Indexed as

Administration, MetronomicAmputation, SurgicalAnimalsBone NeoplasmsCarboplatinCyclophosphamideDiarrheaDisease-Free SurvivalDog DiseasesDogsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleIndolesKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNeutropeniaCarboplatinCyclophosphamideIndolesPiroxicamPyrrolestoceranib phosphate

Identifiers

PMID25923466
PMCPMC4414350
OpenAlexW1993488053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.