Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25923215›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Delivery of GM-CSF to Protect against Influenza Pneumonia.

Renuka Subramaniam, Zachary Hillberry, Han Chen, Yan Feng, Kalyn Fletcher, Pierre Neuenschwander, Homayoun Shams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Bibliometric analysis of intestinal microbiota and lung diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renuka SubramaniamCenter for Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases Control (CPIDC), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, 11937 U.S. Highway 271, Tyler, TX, United States of America.
Zachary HillberryCenter for Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases Control (CPIDC), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, 11937 U.S. Highway 271, Tyler, TX, United States of America.
Han ChenCenter for Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases Control (CPIDC), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, 11937 U.S. Highway 271, Tyler, TX, United States of America.
Yan FengCenter for Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases Control (CPIDC), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, 11937 U.S. Highway 271, Tyler, TX, United States of America.
Kalyn FletcherCenter for Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases Control (CPIDC), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, 11937 U.S. Highway 271, Tyler, TX, United States of America.
Pierre NeuenschwanderBiomedical Research, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, U.S. Highway 271, Tyler, TX, USA.
Homayoun ShamsCenter for Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases Control (CPIDC), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, 11937 U.S. Highway 271, Tyler, TX, United States of America.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince adaptive immunity is thought to be central to immunity against influenza A virus (IAV) pneumonias, preventive strategies have focused primarily on vaccines. However, vaccine efficacy has been variable, in part because of antigenic shift and drift in circulating influenza viruses. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of innate immunity in protecting against influenza.

methodsGranulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) contributes to maturation of mononuclear phagocytes, enhancing their capacity for phagocytosis and cytokine production.

resultsOverexpression of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in the lung of transgenic mice provides remarkable protection against IAV, which depends on alveolar macrophages (AM). In this study, we report that pulmonary delivery of GM-CSF to wild type young and aged mice abrogated mortality from IAV.

conclusionWe also demonstrate that protection is species specific and human GM-CSF do not protect the mice nor stimulates mouse immunity. We also show that IAV-induced lung injury is the culprit for side-effects of GM-CSF in treating mice after IAV infection, and introduce a novel strategy to deliver the GM-CSF to and retain it in the alveolar space even after IAV infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell ProliferationCytokinesGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLungMacrophages, AlveolarMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsPhagocytosisPneumoniaCytokinesGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtective AgentsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25923215
PMCPMC4414562
OpenAlexW1977447968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.